Quantification of Degree of Liver Fibrosis Using Fibrosis Area Fraction Based on Statistical Chi-Square Analysis of Heterogeneity of Liver Tissue Texture on Routine Ultrasound Images

被引:16
作者
Li, Janelle [1 ]
Qureshi, Mustafa [2 ]
Gupta, Avneesh [1 ]
Anderson, Stephan W. [1 ]
Soto, Jorge [1 ]
Li, Baojun [1 ]
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Boston, MA 02118 USA
[2] Boston Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Div Biostat, Boston, MA 02118 USA
关键词
Liver fibrosis; Ultrasound; Fibrosis area fraction; Heterogeneity; Chi-square analysis; SAMPLING VARIABILITY; HEPATIC-FIBROSIS; ACCURACY; BIOPSY; CIRRHOSIS; MARKER;
D O I
10.1016/j.acra.2018.10.004
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Rationale and Objectives: We present a novel method to quantify the degree of liver fibrosis using fibrosis area fraction based on statistical chi-square analysis of heterogeneity of echo texture within liver on routine ultrasound images. We demonstrate, in a clinical study, that fibrosis area fraction derived this way has the potential to become a noninvasive, quantitative radiometric discriminator of normal or low-grade liver fibrosis (Ishak fibrosis score range = F0-3) and advanced liver fibrosis or cirrhosis (Ishak fibrosis score range = F4-6) on routine ultrasound images. Materials and Methods: This retrospective patient study was institutional review board approved. Ultrasound images of 100 patients (61 males, 39 females; 18-81 years) who underwent nontargeted ultrasound-guided biopsy were randomly divided into two groups: a training group consisted of 31 cases, and a validation group that contained the rest cases. An investigator manually selected a primary region of interest (ROI; approximately 4-6 cm(2)) in the liver tissue while avoiding nonhepatic parenchyma. The primary ROI contained a large number of secondary ROls (25 x 25 pixels) to maintain the precision of statistical analysis. Sample variance sigma(2) of image gradient (a texture feature related to the amount of edge structures) was calculated in secondary ROls in a roster scan fashion. A theoretical derivation was presented to estimate population variance (sigma) over tilde (2)(0) of image gradient across the primary ROI from mean gradient of secondary ROls. The chi(2) (chi(2) = sigma(2)/(sigma) over tilde (2)(0)) was computed at each secondary ROI, forming a chi(2) map of liver tissue heterogeneity. A cut-off value was optimized from datasets in the training group by comparing to the fibrosis grades determined by biopsy. This cut-off value was then applied to the datasets in the validation group to convert the chi(2) maps into binary images, from which fibrosis area fractions (fraction of fibrosis area to the total area of the primary ROI) were calculated and entered in a statistical analysis. Results: In the training group, the optimal setting was found to be T-chi 2= 6.0, which resulted a maximum discrimination of F0-3 vs F4-6: p < 0.0001, area under curve = 0.985, sensitivity = 93.7%, specificity = 93.3%. When this setting was applied to the datasets in the validation group, a distinct separation was seen between the two classes (p < 0.0001). F0-3 class had an average fibrosis area fraction of 4.7% (1.7%-11.4%), whereas the F4-6 class had an average fibrosis area fraction of 17.3% (9.8%-29.6%). A strong correlation was demonstrated between the fibrosis area fraction and histological fibrosis grade determined by biopsy (area under curve = 0.89, sensitivity = 87.9%, specificity = 90.3%). Conclusion: The presented method is a promising noninvasive tool for distinguishing normal or low-grade liver fibrosis (F0-3) and advanced liver fibrosis or cirrhosis (F4-6) from routine ultrasound images. These findings support the further development of texture heterogeneity analysis, particularly fibrosis area fraction, as a quantitative biomarker for distinguishing various liver fibrosis grades.
引用
收藏
页码:1001 / 1007
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Accuracy of ultrasound to identify chronic liver disease [J].
Allan, Richard ;
Thoirs, Kerry ;
Phillips, Maureen .
WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2010, 16 (28) :3510-3520
[2]   Noninvasive classification of hepatic fibrosis based on texture parameters from double contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance images [J].
Bahl, Gautam ;
Cruite, Irene ;
Wolfson, Tanya ;
Gamst, Anthony C. ;
Collins, Julie M. ;
Chavez, Alyssa D. ;
Barakat, Fatma ;
Hassanein, Tarek ;
Sirlin, Claude B. .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2012, 36 (05) :1154-1161
[3]   Quantifying liver fibrosis through the application of texture analysis to diffusion weighted imaging [J].
Barry, Brian ;
Buch, Karen ;
Soto, Jorge A. ;
Jara, Hernan ;
Nakhmani, Arie ;
Anderson, Stephan W. .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2014, 32 (01) :84-90
[4]   Sampling variability of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C [J].
Bedossa, P ;
Dargère, D ;
Paradis, V .
HEPATOLOGY, 2003, 38 (06) :1449-1457
[5]   Quantitative Assessment of Variation in CT Parameters on Texture Features: Pilot Study Using a Nonanatomic Phantom [J].
Buch, K. ;
Li, B. ;
Qureshi, M. M. ;
Kuno, H. ;
Anderson, S. W. ;
Sakai, O. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2017, 38 (05) :981-985
[6]   Using Texture Analysis to Determine Human Papillomavirus Status of Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinomas on CT [J].
Buch, K. ;
Fujita, A. ;
Li, B. ;
Kawashima, Y. ;
Qureshi, M. M. ;
Sakai, O. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2015, 36 (07) :1343-1348
[7]   Practices of liver biopsy in France: Results of a prospective nationwide survey [J].
Cadranel, JF ;
Rufat, P ;
Degos, F .
HEPATOLOGY, 2000, 32 (03) :477-481
[8]   Severe liver fibrosis or cirrhosis: Accuracy of US for detection - Analysis of 300 cases [J].
Colli, A ;
Fraquelli, M ;
Andreoletti, M ;
Marino, B ;
Zuccoli, E ;
Conte, D .
RADIOLOGY, 2003, 227 (01) :89-94
[9]  
D'Onofrio M, 2005, RADIOL MED, V110, P341
[10]   Using texture analyses of contrast enhanced CT to assess hepatic fibrosis [J].
Daginawala, Naznin ;
Li, Baojun ;
Buch, Karen ;
Yu, HeiShun ;
Tischler, Brian ;
Qureshi, Muhammad Mustafa ;
Soto, Jorge A. ;
Anderson, Stephan .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 85 (03) :511-517