Psychometric properties of the Cognitive and Metacognitive Learning Strategies Scales among preservice physical education teachers: A bifactor analysis

被引:17
作者
Liu, Jiling [1 ]
Xiang, Ping [1 ]
McBride, Ron [1 ]
Chen, Han [2 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Hlth & Kinesiol, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[2] Valdosta State Univ, Dept Kinesiol & Phys Educ, Valdosta, GA USA
关键词
Self-regulated learning; cognitive strategies; metacognition; construct validity; score reliability; physical education teacher education; SELF-REGULATION; MOTIVATED STRATEGIES; MOTOR SKILL; QUESTIONNAIRE; VALIDITY; MODEL; NUMBER; SPORT; GOALS;
D O I
10.1177/1356336X18755087
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Although widely used to measure self-regulated learning strategies, the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire has not yielded satisfactory construct validity across empirical studies. This study examined its psychometric properties by focusing on one of its subscales, the Cognitive and Metacognitive Learning Strategies Scales, among 419 preservice physical education teachers (M-age = 23.05 years, SD = 4.28) from five physical education teacher preparation programmes in the southwestern United States of America. The participants responded to the 31-item Cognitive and Metacognitive Learning Strategies Scales, which assessed five categories of learning strategies: rehearsal, elaboration, organization, critical thinking, and metacognitive self-regulation. Each item was on a seven-point Likert scale. Initial confirmatory factor analysis did not support the original five-factor model. Following exploratory factor analysis identified three latent factors. Subsequent bifactor exploratory factor analysis revealed one general factor and two group factors, and following bifactor confirmatory factor analysis confirmed that this structure had an acceptable model fit, chi(2)((353)) = 731.327, p <.001; Root Mean Square Error of Approximation = .053; Comparative Fit Index = .907; Standardized Root Mean Square Residual = .047. A respecified bifactor model with 18 items resulted in a good fit, chi(2)((120)) = 161.384, p (Hierarchical) = .825; for the two group factors, Omega(Scales) = .211 and .238, respectively. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:616 / 639
页数:24
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
Alkharusi H., 2012, College Student Journal, V46, P567
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, IBM SPSS STAT WINDOW
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1998, MPLUS VERSION 7 4 CO
[4]  
Bartels J.M., 2010, Individual Differences Research, V8, P97
[5]   Construct Validity of Self-Reported Metacognitive Learning Strategies [J].
Berger, Jean-Louis ;
Karabenick, Stuart A. .
EDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT, 2016, 21 (01) :19-33
[6]  
Bloom B. S., 1956, TAXONOMY ED OBJECTIV, DOI DOI 10.1300/J104V03N01_03
[7]  
Brown T. A., 2015, Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research, V2
[8]  
Buyukozturk S., 2004, EDUC SCI-THEOR PRACT, V4, P207
[9]  
Buzza D, 2013, BROCK EDUC, V23, P58
[10]   SCREE TEST FOR NUMBER OF FACTORS [J].
CATTELL, RB .
MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 1966, 1 (02) :245-276