Ecological Forestry in the Southeast: Understanding the Ecology of Fuels

被引:1
|
作者
Mitchell, Robert J. [1 ]
Hiers, J. Kevin [1 ]
O'Brien, Joseph [2 ]
Starr, Gregory [3 ]
机构
[1] Jones Ecol Res Ctr, Newton, GA 39870 USA
[2] US Forest Serv, So Expt Stn, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[3] Univ Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 USA
关键词
ecology of fuels; longleaf pine; ecological forestry; fire; tree selection; PINE PINUS-PALUSTRIS; LIFE-HISTORY TRAITS; BURNING CHARACTERISTICS; FIRE; WIND; REPRODUCTION; REGENERATION; VEGETATION; FLORIDA; CANOPY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Fire is a dominant disturbance within many forested ecosystems worldwide. Understanding the complex feedbacks among vegetation as a fuel for fire, the effects of fuels on fire behavior, and the impact of fire behavior on future vegetation are critical for sustaining biodiversity, in fire-dependent forests. Nonetheless, understanding in fire ecology has been limited in part by the difficulties in establishing the connections between fire behavior and vegetation response. To address this issue, we present the concept of the ecology of fuels, which emphasizes the critical role that fuels play in conceptually linking feedbacks between fire and vegetation. This article explores the ecology of the fuels concept for longleaf pine woodlands and illustrates its utility by evaluating the principles of ecological forestry (incorporating legacies of disturbances, understanding intermediate stand development processes, and allowing for recovery periods) in this chronically disturbed ecosystem. We review the research behind our understanding of these feedbacks in longleaf pine ecosystems of the southeastern United States and review the applications of these principles through the Stoddard-Neel method of ecological forestry. Understanding these feedbacks is critical for integrating fire ecology and ecological forestry in the Southeast and in other fire-dependent forest types.
引用
收藏
页码:391 / 397
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Towards Integrated Understanding of the Rhizosphere Phenomenon as Ecological Driver: Can Rhizoculture Improve Agricultural and Forestry Systems?
    Garcia-Montero, Luis G.
    Manzano, Pablo
    Alwanney, Deaa
    Valverde-Asenjo, Inmaculada
    Alvarez-Lafuente, Amaya
    Benito-Matias, Luis F.
    Parlade, Xavier
    Ortuno, Sigfredo
    Morcillo, Marcos
    Gasco, Antonio
    Calderon-Guerrero, Carlos
    Mauro, Francisco
    Mendez, Mercedes
    Sanchez-Medina, Alvaro
    Andres, Maria P.
    Quintana, Jose R.
    Menta, Cristina
    Pinto, Stefania
    Pinto, Liliana
    Pita, Pilar
    Turkmen, Cafer
    Pascual, Cristina
    Ayuga, Esperanza
    Torrent, Fernando
    Robredo, Jose C.
    Martin-Ortega, Pablo
    Pera, Joan
    Gomez, Luis
    Almendros, Gonzalo
    Colinas, Carlos
    Verrecchia, Eric P.
    SOIL BIOLOGICAL COMMUNITIES AND ECOSYSTEM RESILIENCE, 2017, : 43 - 75
  • [42] Ecological perspectives on variable retention forestry
    Guillermo J. Martínez Pastur
    Ilkka Vanha-Majamaa
    Jerry F. Franklin
    Ecological Processes, 9
  • [43] The ecological consequences of using clones in forestry
    Bradshaw, Richard H. W.
    Ingvarsson, Par K.
    Rosvall, Ola
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 2019, 34 (05) : 380 - 389
  • [44] Exploring the Origins of Ecological Forestry in North
    D'Amato, Anthony W.
    Palik, Brian J.
    Franklin, Jerry F.
    Foster, David R.
    JOURNAL OF FORESTRY, 2017, 115 (02) : 126 - 127
  • [45] Ecological perspectives on variable retention forestry
    Martinez Pastur, Guillermo J.
    Vanha-Majamaa, Ilkka
    Franklin, Jerry F.
    ECOLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2020, 9 (01)
  • [46] Ecological effects of peatland drainage for forestry
    Environ Rev, 3-4 (286-303):
  • [47] Ecological restoration: What role for forestry!
    Arganbright, DG
    JOURNAL OF FORESTRY, 2000, 98 (08) : 1 - 1
  • [49] VTT turns forestry waste into transport fuels and chemicals
    不详
    PULP & PAPER-CANADA, 2019, 120 (02) : 12 - 12
  • [50] FORESTRY PRACTICE IN BRITAIN IS APPLIED TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY
    HOLTAM, B
    COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW, 1976, 55 (02): : 123 - 127