Phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation in cases of pars planitis

被引:45
作者
Ganesh, SK [1 ]
Babu, K [1 ]
Biswas, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Med & Vis Res Fdn, Madras 600006, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.02.090
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To analyze the results of phacoemulsification cataract surgery with implantation of posterior chamber intraocular lenses (IOLs) of different biomaterials in eyes with pars planitis. Setting: Medical and Vision Research Foundations, Sankara Nethralaya, Chennai, India. Methods: The records of 86 patients (100 eyes) with pars planitis who had phacoemulsification with IOL implantation between January 1997 and April 2003 were retrospectively analyzed. The eyes were divided into 3 groups depending on IOL biomaterial: poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) (n = 32), heparin-surface-modified PMMA (n = 39), or acrylic (n = 29). The postoperative visual outcome and complications in each group were analyzed. Results: Forty-seven patients were men and 39, women. The mean age was 38 years (range 10 to 65 years) and the mean follow-up, 19.67 months (range 3.00 to 54.53 months). At the final follow-up, 91 eyes (91%) had better visual acuity than preoperatively; 79 had an improvement of 2 or more Snellen lines, 12 had an improvement of 1 Snellen line, 4 had no change, and 5 had a decrease as a result of reactivation of the pars planitis and progression of cystoid macular edema (CME). Significant posterior capsule opacification occurred in 10 eyes (10%), CME in 50 eyes (50%), reactivation of pars planitis in 51 eyes (51%), IOL deposits in 29 eyes (29%), IOL decentration in 1 eye (1%), and anterior capsule fibrosis in 14 eyes (14%). The most frequent cause of poor visual recovery was CME, submacular fibrosis, and epiretinal membrane. There was no statistically significant difference in these complications between the 3 groups. Conclusions: Phacoemulsification with IOL implantation in eyes with pars planitis was safe and led to good visual outcomes in most cases. The factors in surgical success were control of inflammation, meticulous surgery, in-the-bag IOL implantation, and vigilant postoperative care. (C) 2004 ASCRS and ESCRS.
引用
收藏
页码:2072 / 2076
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Results of hydrophilic acrylic, hydrophobic acrylic, and silicone intraocular lenses in uveitic eyes with cataract - Comparison to a control group [J].
Abela-Formanek, C ;
Amon, M ;
Schauersberger, J ;
Kruger, A ;
Nepp, J ;
Schild, G .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2002, 28 (07) :1141-1152
[2]   Comparative performance of intraocular lenses in eyes with cataract and uveitis [J].
Alió, JL ;
Chipont, E ;
BenEzra, D ;
Fakhry, MA .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2002, 28 (12) :2096-2108
[3]   In vivo study of cell reactions on poly(methyl methacrylate) intraocular lenses with different surface properties [J].
Amon, M ;
Menapace, R ;
Radax, U ;
Freyler, H .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 1996, 22 :825-829
[4]   Phacoemulsification cataract extraction and posterior chamber lens implantation in patients with uveitis [J].
Estafanous, MFG ;
Lowder, CY ;
Meisler, DM ;
Chauhan, R .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2001, 131 (05) :620-625
[5]  
Fogla R, 1999, OPHTHALMIC SURG LAS, V30, P191
[6]  
Foster Charles Stephen, 2003, Curr Opin Ophthalmol, V14, P1
[7]   CATARACT-SURGERY AND INTRAOCULAR-LENS IMPLANTATION IN PATIENTS WITH UVEITIS [J].
FOSTER, CS ;
FONG, LP ;
SINGH, G .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1989, 96 (03) :281-287
[8]   CATARACT-EXTRACTION IN UVEITIS PATIENTS [J].
HOOPER, PL ;
RAO, NA ;
SMITH, RE .
SURVEY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1990, 35 (02) :120-144
[9]  
KAUFMAN AH, 1993, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V100, P1210
[10]   A retrospective analysis of heparin-surface-modified intraocular lenses versus regular polymethylmethacrylate intraocular lenses in patients with uveitis [J].
Lardenoye, CWTA ;
VanDerLeLij, A ;
Berendschot, TTJM ;
Rothova, A .
DOCUMENTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 1996, 92 (01) :41-50