The ethics of elective (nontherapeutic) ventilation

被引:20
作者
Browne, A [1 ]
Gillett, G
Tweeddale, M
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Div Hlth Care Eth, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
[2] Univ Otago, Bioeth Res Ctr, Dunedin, New Zealand
[3] Hlth Care Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
[4] Queen Alexandra Hosp, Dept Intens Care Med, Portsmouth, Hants, England
关键词
D O I
10.1111/1467-8519.00179
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Elective ventilation (EV) is ventilation applied not in the interest of Patients, but in order to secure transplantable organs. If carries with if a small risk that Patients who would otherwise have died will survive an a Persistent vegetative state. Is EV ever justifiable We argue: (I) The only! thing which can justify exposing patients to risk not taken for their benefit is their consent, and we cannot rely on implied consent or third party consent in the case of EV Thus, absent explicit consent of patients , EII is not justifiable (2) It is not clear that explicit consent should be sought, or where it is offered honoured, given the potential EV has for deterring organ donors and causing stress to staff and families.
引用
收藏
页码:42 / 57
页数:16
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
*AC SERV POL UN, 1994, 841 AC SERV POL UN
[2]  
FEEST TG, 1990, LANCET, V335, P1135
[3]  
FENWICK J, COMMUNICATION
[4]  
*KINGS FUND I, 1994, 18 KINGS FUND I, P64
[5]  
LYNN J, 1993, KENNEDY INST ETHIC J, V3, P168
[6]  
NEUBERGER J, 1995, BRIT MED J, V310, P716
[7]  
PRICE DPT, 1996, J LAW MED ETHICS, V24, P140
[8]  
PRICE DPT, 1996, J LAW MED ETHICS, V24, P143
[9]   AN ETHICAL DEBATE - ELECTIVE VENTILATION OF POTENTIAL ORGAN DONORS [J].
RIAD, H ;
NICHOLLS, A .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 310 (6981) :714-715
[10]  
ROUTH G, 1992, CARE CRITICALLY ILL, V8, P61