Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Mobilization Tactics

被引:21
作者
Rosenbeck, Lindsay L. [1 ]
Srivastava, Shivani [2 ]
Kiel, Patrick J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Simon Canc Ctr Clarian Hlth, Dept Pharm, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[2] Indiana Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
关键词
G-CSF; mobilization; plerixafor; stem cell transplantation; COLONY-STIMULATING FACTOR; NON-HODGKINS-LYMPHOMA; PLUS G-CSF; HEMATOPOIETIC PROGENITOR CELLS; BONE-MARROW-TRANSPLANTATION; HIGH-DOSE CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE; MULTIPLE-MYELOMA PATIENTS; FACTOR RHG-CSF; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; MYELOSUPPRESSIVE CHEMOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1345/aph.1M289
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the methods and collection techniques currently used in stem cell mobilization for patients undergoing autologous transplantation. DATA SOURCES: Literature search was performed through PubMed (1948-August 2009) and MEDLINE (1977-August 2009). Reference citations from publications identified were also reviewed. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: All literature identified was reviewed for inclusion. Original research and retrospective cohorts, along with previously published systematic reviews of stem cell mobilization and growth factors, were evaluated. Abstract data on plerixafor were also reviewed. DATA SYNTHESIS: Successful mobilization of an adequate number of progenitor cells can help ensure and improve time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment. A variety of methods have been studied to find the safest and most predictable mobilization of CD34+ progenitor cells, including use of single agents or the combinations of hematopoietic growth factors, chemotherapy, and a novel chemokine receptor 4 antagonist. Currently, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) 10 mu g/kg daily started 4 days prior to apheresis remains the standard of care for initial mobilization therapy. In patients who fail to mobilize or who are at high risk for mobilization failure, cyclophosphamide in conjunction with G-CSF may be used. Plerixafor, a novel chemokine receptor antagonist, in combination with G-CSF has demonstrated superiority for achieving collection goals compared to G-CSF alone in 2 Phase 3 trials. CONCLUSIONS: The optimal mobilization strategy is still unknown; however, colony-stimulating factors remain the most commonly used mobilization agents. Currently, chemotherapy or plerixafor in combination with G-CSF is a reasonable option in heavily pretreated and hard-to-mobilize patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and multiple myeloma.
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 116
页数:10
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]   The chemokine SDF-1 is a chemoattractant for human CD34(+) hematopoietic progenitor cells and provides a new mechanism to explain the mobilization of CD34(+) progenitors to peripheral blood [J].
Aiuti, A ;
Webb, IJ ;
Bleul, C ;
Springer, T ;
GutierrezRamos, JC .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 1997, 185 (01) :111-120
[2]   ESHAP plus fixed dose G-CSF as autologous peripheral blood stem cell mobilization regimen in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large cell and Hodgkin's lymphoma: a single institution result of 127 patients [J].
Akhtar, S ;
Tbakhi, A ;
Humaidan, H ;
El Weshi, A ;
Rahal, M ;
Maghfoor, I .
BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2006, 37 (03) :277-282
[3]   Allogeneic peripheral blood stem-cell compared with bone marrow transplantation in the management of hematologic malignancies: An individual patient data meta-analysis of nine randomized trials [J].
al-Jurf, M ;
Aranha, F ;
Annassetti, C ;
Apperley, JF ;
Baynes, R ;
Bensinger, WI ;
Blaise, D ;
Chaudhary, MA ;
Clarke, M ;
Cornelissen, JJ ;
Couban, S ;
Cutler, C ;
Djulbegovic, B ;
Gyger, M ;
Gratwohl, A ;
Heldal, D ;
Van der Holt, B ;
Hozo, I ;
Kuentz, M ;
Kumar, A ;
Lipton, J ;
Matchamm, J ;
Mohty, M ;
Morton, J ;
Panzarella, T ;
Powles, R ;
Richards, SM ;
Sahovic, E ;
Schmitz, N ;
Simpson, DR ;
Sirohi, B ;
Soares, HP ;
de Souza, CA ;
Vigorito, AC ;
Wheatley, K .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (22) :5074-5087
[4]   Comparison of peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma: High-dose cyclophosphamide plus GM-CSF vs G-CSF alone [J].
Alegre, A ;
Tomas, JF ;
MartinezChamorro, C ;
GilFernandez, JJ ;
FernandezVillalta, MJ ;
Arranz, R ;
Diaz, MA ;
Granda, A ;
Bernardo, MR ;
Escudero, A ;
LopezLorenzo, JL ;
FernandezRanada, JM .
BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 1997, 20 (03) :211-217
[5]  
*AMG INC, 1991, PROD INF NEUP FILGR
[6]   Duration of filgrastim mobilization and apheresis yield of CD34(+) progenitor cells and lymphoid subsets in normal donors for allogeneic transplantation [J].
Anderlini, P ;
Przepiorka, D ;
Huh, Y ;
Lauppe, J ;
Miller, P ;
Sundberg, J ;
Seong, D ;
Champlin, R ;
Korbling, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 1996, 93 (04) :940-942
[7]  
Ashihara E, 2000, HAEMATOLOGICA, V85, P1112
[8]   A prospective, randomized trial of autologous bone marrow transplantation and chemotherapy in multiple myeloma [J].
Attal, M ;
Harousseau, JL ;
Stoppa, AM ;
Sotto, JJ ;
Fuzibet, JG ;
Rossi, JF ;
Casassus, P ;
Maisonneuve, H ;
Facon, T ;
Ifrah, N ;
Payen, C ;
Bataille, R .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 335 (02) :91-97
[9]  
*BAYER HLTH PHARM, 2008, PROD INF LEUK SARG
[10]   FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE COLLECTION AND ENGRAFTMENT OF AUTOLOGOUS PERIPHERAL-BLOOD STEM-CELLS [J].
BENSINGER, W ;
APPELBAUM, F ;
ROWLEY, S ;
STORB, R ;
SANDERS, J ;
LILLEBY, K ;
GOOLEY, T ;
DEMIRER, T ;
SCHIFFMAN, K ;
WEAVER, C ;
CLIFT, R ;
CHAUNCEY, T ;
KLARNET, J ;
MONTGOMERY, P ;
PETERSDORF, S ;
WEIDEN, P ;
WITHERSPOON, R ;
BUCKNER, CD .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1995, 13 (10) :2547-2555