Muscle energy technique for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review

被引:13
作者
Baxter, Danielle A. [1 ]
Shergis, Johannah L. [1 ]
Fazalbhoy, Azharuddin [1 ]
Coyle, Meaghan E. [1 ]
机构
[1] RMIT Univ, Sch Hlth & Biomed Sci, POB 71, Bundoora, Vic 3083, Australia
关键词
Manual therapy; Muscle energy technique; COPD; Systematic review; OSTEOPATHIC MANIPULATIVE TREATMENT; MANUAL THERAPY; EXERCISE CAPACITY; ELDERLY-PATIENTS; COPD; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.1186/s12998-019-0256-9
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Background: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is an increasingly prevalent respiratory disease that impacts on daily living. In addition to difficulty breathing, many people experience extrapulmonary comorbidities such as musculoskeletal disorders. Pulmonary rehabilitation can improve fitness and strength but may be difficult for patients with musculoskeletal disorders. Recent research indicates promising benefits of adding manual therapy to standard care to improve clinical outcomes. Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Muscle Energy Technique (MET) for people with COPD. Methods: Ten databases were searched from inceptions to May 2018. Eligible studies were randomised controlled trials assessing MET compared to any control for COPD. Outcomes included lung function, exercise capacity, health-related quality of life, and adverse events. Results: Three randomised controlled trials assessing 90 participants were included. The quality of the research was limited by reporting of outcome measures and results, varying treatment protocols, and small sample sizes. Results from one study showed that pulmonary function was not statistically different between groups at end of treatment (FEV1% MD 4.87%; 95% CI - 0.79 to 10.53). Exercise capacity and perceived dyspnoea ratings were improved in single studies. Adverse events were unrelated to the MET intervention. Conclusions: The use of MET for COPD is an emerging field of research, with few studies evaluating its efficacy and safety. Currently, there is insufficient evidence to support the use of MET in the management of COPD. Rigorously designed studies with larger sample sizes are needed to better understand the role of MET for COPD.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] COPD as a Systemic Disease
    Agusti, Alvar
    Soriano, Joan B.
    [J]. COPD-JOURNAL OF CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE, 2008, 5 (02) : 133 - 138
  • [2] Anand A, 2013, INDIAN J PHYSIOTHER, V7, P192, DOI 10.5958/j.0973-5674.7.3.091
  • [3] [Anonymous], COPD DEF
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2018, Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management and Prevention of COPD
  • [5] Ballantyne F., 2003, J OSTEOPATH MED, V6, P59, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1443-8461(03)80015-1
  • [6] Adverse events and manual therapy: A systematic review
    Carnes, Dawn
    Mars, Thomas S.
    Mullinger, Brenda
    Froud, Robert
    Underwood, Martin
    [J]. MANUAL THERAPY, 2010, 15 (04) : 355 - 363
  • [7] Defining adverse events in manual therapies: A modified Delphi consensus study
    Carnes, Dawn
    Mullinger, Brenda
    Underwood, Martin
    [J]. MANUAL THERAPY, 2010, 15 (01) : 2 - 6
  • [8] Chaitow L., 2013, Muscle energy techniques, V4th
  • [9] The immediate effect of soft tissue manual therapy intervention on lung function in severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
    Cruz-Montecinos, Carlos
    Godoy-Olave, Diego
    Contreras-Briceno, Felipe A.
    Gutierrez, Paulina
    Torres-Castro, Rodrigo
    Miret-Venegas, Leandro
    Engel, Roger M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE, 2017, 12 : 691 - 696
  • [10] DeStefano L., 2011, GREENMANS PRINCIPLES, V4th