Accuracy of Grading Gleason Score 7 Prostatic Adenocarcinoma on Needle Biopsy: Influence of Percent Pattern 4 and Other Histological Factors

被引:14
作者
Meliti, Abdelrazak [1 ]
Sadimin, Evita [1 ]
Diolombi, Mario [1 ]
Khani, Francesca [1 ]
Epstein, Jonathan I. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, Dept Pathol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, Dept Urol, 401 N Broadway St,Rm 2242, Baltimore, MD 21231 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, Dept Oncol, 401 N Broadway St,Rm 2242, Baltimore, MD 21231 USA
关键词
prostate cancer; gleason grading; percent pattern 4; interobserver; ISUP CONSENSUS CONFERENCE; INTEROBSERVER-REPRODUCIBILITY; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; UROLOGIC-PATHOLOGISTS; INTERNATIONAL-SOCIETY; GENERAL PATHOLOGISTS; CANCER; CARCINOMA; IMPROVES; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1002/pros.23314
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUNDRecognition of Gleason pattern 4 in prostatic needle biopsies is crucial for both prognosis and therapy. Recently, it has been recommended to record percent pattern 4 when Gleason score 7 cancer is the highest grade in a case. METHODSFour hundred and five prostate needle core biopsies received for a second opinion at our institution from February-June, 2015 were prospectively diagnosed with prostatic adenocarcinoma Gleason score 7 as the highest score on review by a consultant urological pathologist. Percentage of core involvement by cancer, percentage of Gleason pattern 4 per core, distribution of Gleason pattern 4 (clustered, scattered), morphology of pattern 4 (cribriform, non-cribriform), and whether the cancer was continuous or discontinuous were recorded. RESULTSBetter agreement was noted between the consultant and referring pathologists when pattern 4 was clustered as opposed to dispersed in biopsies (P=0.009). The percentage of core involvement by cancer, morphology of pattern 4, and continuity of cancer did not affect the agreement between the consultant and referring pathologists. There was a trend (P=0.06) for better agreement based on the percent of pattern 4. CONCLUSIONSWhen pattern 4 is scattered amongst pattern 3 as opposed to being discrete foci, there is less interobserver reproducibility in grading Gleason score 7 cancer, and in this setting pathologists should consider obtaining second opinions either internally within their group or externally. Prostate 77: 681-685, 2017. (c) 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:681 / 685
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: Urologic pathologists
    Allsbrook, WC
    Mangold, KA
    Johnson, MH
    Lane, RB
    Lane, CG
    Amin, MB
    Bostwick, DG
    Humphrey, PA
    Jones, EC
    Reuter, VE
    Sakr, W
    Sesterhenn, IA
    Troncoso, P
    Wheeler, TM
    Epstein, JI
    [J]. HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 2001, 32 (01) : 74 - 80
  • [2] Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: General pathologists
    Allsbrook, WC
    Mangold, KA
    Johnson, MH
    Lane, RB
    Lane, CG
    Epstein, JI
    [J]. HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 2001, 32 (01) : 81 - 88
  • [3] Gleason Score 7 Prostate Cancer on Needle Biopsy: Relation of Primary Pattern 3 or 4 to Pathological Stage and Progression After Radical Prostatectomy
    Amin, Ali
    Partin, Alan
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 186 (04) : 1286 - 1290
  • [4] Primary Gleason pattern in biopsy Gleason score 7 is predictive of adverse histopathological features and biochemical failure following radical prostatectomy
    Berg, Kasper Drimer
    Roder, Martin Andreas
    Brasso, Klaus
    Vainer, Ben
    Iversen, Peter
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 48 (02) : 168 - 176
  • [5] Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading:: evaluation using prostate cancer tissue microarrays
    Burchardt, M.
    Engers, R.
    Mueller, M.
    Burchardt, T.
    Willers, R.
    Epstein, J. I.
    Ackermann, R.
    Gabbert, H. E.
    de la Taille, A.
    Rubin, M. A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 134 (10) : 1071 - 1078
  • [6] The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma
    Epstein, JI
    Allsbrook, WC
    Amin, MB
    Egevad, LL
    Bastacky, S
    Beltrán, AL
    Berner, A
    Billis, A
    Boccon-Gibod, L
    Cheng, L
    Civantos, F
    Cohen, C
    Cohen, MB
    Datta, M
    Davis, C
    Delahunt, B
    Delprado, W
    Eble, JN
    Foster, CS
    Furusato, M
    Gaudin, PB
    Grignon, DJ
    Humphrey, PA
    Iczkowski, KA
    Jones, EC
    Lucia, S
    McCue, PA
    Nazeer, T
    Oliva, E
    Pan, CC
    Pizov, G
    Reuter, V
    Samaratunga, H
    Sebo, T
    Sesterhenn, I
    Shevchuk, M
    Srigley, JR
    Suzigan, S
    Takahashi, H
    Tamboli, P
    Tan, PH
    Têtu, B
    Tickoo, S
    Tomaszewski, JE
    Troncoso, P
    Tsuzuki, T
    True, LD
    van der Kwast, T
    Wheeler, TM
    Wojno, KJ
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2005, 29 (09) : 1228 - 1242
  • [7] Update on the Gleason grading system for prostate cancer - Results of an international consensus conference of urologic pathologists
    Epstein, JI
    Allsbrook, WC
    Amin, MB
    Egevad, LL
    [J]. ADVANCES IN ANATOMIC PATHOLOGY, 2006, 13 (01) : 57 - 59
  • [8] The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    Egevad, Lars
    Amin, Mahul B.
    Delahunt, Brett
    Srigley, John R.
    Humphrey, Peter A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2016, 40 (02) : 244 - 252
  • [9] HISTOLOGIC GRADING OF PROSTATE-CANCER - A PERSPECTIVE
    GLEASON, DF
    [J]. HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 1992, 23 (03) : 273 - 279
  • [10] Gleason DF, 1974, J UROLOGY, V167, P953