Refinement of major- and minor-element PIXE analysis of rocks and minerals

被引:22
作者
Heirwegh, Christopher M. [1 ]
Campbell, John L. [1 ]
Czamanske, Gerald K. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Guelph, Guelph Waterloo Phys Inst, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
[2] US Geol Survey, 345 Middlefield Rd, Menlo Pk, CA 94025 USA
[3] 750 West Greenwich Pl, Palo Alto, CA 94303 USA
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
PIXE; Geochemistry; Standardization; Accuracy; Detector linearity; SILICATE MINERALS; MICRO-PIXE; RAY; STANDARDS; ENERGIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.nimb.2015.10.018
中图分类号
TH7 [仪器、仪表];
学科分类号
0804 ; 080401 ; 081102 ;
摘要
An attempt has been made to assess the accuracy of the particle-induced X-ray emission (PIXE) fundamental parameters with standards approach to quantifying major- and minor-element constituents of silicate glasses and minerals. A deviation from linearity at low energies in the channel-energy calibration relationship was identified as a source of undesired residues in GUPIX-fitting. A correction for this effect was developed using a general-purpose spectrum fitting program and was incorporated in GUPIX. The PIXE spectra of sixteen well-characterized electron microprobe standards were then processed. Complementary electron probe micro-analysis (EPMA) measurements were used to support the comparison of the PIXE results with previous characterizations. Major element concentrations were found to differ on average from literature values as follows: SiO2 (-0.28 +/- 0.12%), Al2O3 (0.72 +/- 0.74%), MgO (0.11 +/- 0.63%), Na2O (-2.6 +/- 1.2%), K2O (1.1 +/- 0.7%), Cab (-0.35 +/- 0.37%), TiO2 (2.5 +/- 1.9%), MnO (0.8 +/- 4.7%), FeO (0.98 +/- 0.93%). These results indicate that major and minor elemental analysis can be achieved with high accuracy using the present Guelph micro-PIXE setup. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:40 / 50
页数:11
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Berger M., NIST, PML, DOI [10.18434/T48G6X, DOI 10.18434/T48G6X]
[2]   Quantitative analysis of major elements in silicate minerals and glasses by micro-PIXE [J].
Campbell, JL ;
Czamanske, GK ;
MacDonald, L ;
Teesdale, WJ .
NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION B-BEAM INTERACTIONS WITH MATERIALS AND ATOMS, 1997, 130 (1-4) :608-616
[3]   A CRITIQUE OF PEAK-FITTING IN GE SPECTROSCOPY USING THE 80-KV DOUBLET OF BA-133 AS EXAMPLE [J].
CAMPBELL, JL .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED RADIATION AND ISOTOPES, 1982, 33 (08) :661-665
[4]   Calibration of the Mars Science Laboratory Alpha Particle X-ray Spectrometer [J].
Campbell, John L. ;
Perrett, Glynis M. ;
Gellert, Ralf ;
Andrushenko, Stefan M. ;
Boyd, Nicholas I. ;
Maxwell, John A. ;
King, Penelope L. ;
Schofield, Celeste D. M. .
SPACE SCIENCE REVIEWS, 2012, 170 (1-4) :319-340
[5]  
Chantler CT., 2005, X-ray form factor
[6]  
CRAWFORD ML, 1966, AM MINERAL, V51, P523
[7]  
CZAMANSKE GK, 1993, AM MINERAL, V78, P893
[8]   X-ray transition energies: new approach to a comprehensive evaluation [J].
Deslattes, RD ;
Kessler, EG ;
Indelicato, P ;
de Billy, L ;
Lindroth, E ;
Anton, J .
REVIEWS OF MODERN PHYSICS, 2003, 75 (01) :35-99
[9]   1987 COMPILATION OF ELEMENTAL CONCENTRATION DATA FOR USGS BHVO-1, MAG-1, QLO-1, RGM-1, SCO-1, SDC-1, SGR-1 AND STM-1 [J].
GLADNEY, ES ;
ROELANDTS, I .
GEOSTANDARDS NEWSLETTER-THE JOURNAL OF GEOSTANDARDS AND GEOANALYSIS, 1988, 12 (02) :253-362
[10]  
Goldich S.S., 1967, CAN J EARTH SCI, V4, P747, DOI [10.1139/e67-052, DOI 10.1139/E67-052]