Implementing Competency-Based Medical Education in Family Medicine: A Narrative Review of Current Trends in Assessment

被引:20
作者
Danilovich, Natalia [1 ]
Kitto, Simon [1 ]
Price, David W. [4 ]
Campbell, Craig [5 ]
Hodgson, Amanda [3 ]
Hendry, Paul [2 ]
机构
[1] Dept Innovat Med Educ, Off Continuing Profess Dev, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[2] Fac Med, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Colorado, Anschutz Sch Med, Aurora, CO USA
[5] Royal Coll Phys & Surg Canada, Off Specialty Educ, Ottawa, ON, Canada
关键词
CONTINUING PROFESSIONAL-DEVELOPMENT; EVALUATION OBJECTIVES; ACHIEVEMENT SYSTEM; FIELD NOTES; RESIDENTS; PERSPECTIVES; RELIABILITY; CRITERIA; TEACHERS; REDESIGN;
D O I
10.22454/FamMed.2021.453158
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The implementation of effective competency-based medical education (CBME) relies on building a coherent and integrated system of assessment across the continuum of training to practice. As such, the developmental progression of competencies must be assessed at all stages of the learning process, including continuing professional development (CPD). Yet, much of the recent discussion revolves mostly around residency programs. The purpose of this review is to synthesize the findings of studies spanning the last 2 decades that examined competency-based assessment methods used in family medicine residency and CPD, and to identify gaps in their current practices. METHODS: We adopted a modified form of narrative review and searched five online databases and the gray literature for articles published between 2000 and 2020. Data analysis involved mixed methods including quantitative frequency analysis and qualitative thematic analysis. RESULTS: Thirty-seven studies met inclusion criteria. Fourteen were formal evaluation studies that focused on the outcome and impact evaluation of assessment methods. Articles that focused on formative assessment were prevalent. The most common levels of educational outcomes were performance and competence. There were few studies on CBME assessment among practicing family physicians. Thematic analysis of the literature identified several challenges the family medicine educational community faces with CBME assessment. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend that those involved in health education systematically evaluate and publish their CBME activities, including assessment-related content and evaluations. The highlighted themes may offer insights into ways in which current CBME assessment practices might be improved to align with efforts to improve health care.'
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 22
页数:14
相关论文
共 136 条
[1]  
Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, 2000, TOOLB ASS METH
[2]  
Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, 1999, OUTC PROJ GEN COMP
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, LETT, DOI DOI 10.1186/S11671-016-1630-3
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2016, COCHRANE DATABASE SY, DOI DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD012418
[5]   SANRA-a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles [J].
Baethge, Christopher ;
Goldbeck-Wood, Sandra ;
Mertens, Stephan .
RESEARCH INTEGRITY AND PEER REVIEW, 2019, 4 (01)
[6]  
Baglia J, 2011, FAM MED, V43, P90
[7]  
Barlow Patrick B, 2017, J Grad Med Educ, V9, P302, DOI 10.4300/JGME-D-16-00571.1
[8]  
Barr H., 2000, Evaluations of Inter-professional Education: A United Kingdom Revieti' for Health and Social Care
[9]  
Blase KA, 2010, BLUEPR VIOL PREV C S
[10]   Programmatic assessment of competency-based workplace learning: when theory meets practice [J].
Bok, Harold G. J. ;
Teunissen, Pim W. ;
Favier, Robert P. ;
Rietbroek, Nancy J. ;
Theyse, Lars F. H. ;
Brommer, Harold ;
Haarhuis, Jan C. M. ;
van Beukelen, Peter ;
van der Vleuten, Cees P. M. ;
Jaarsma, Debbie A. D. C. .
BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2013, 13