Debriefing and Learning Strategies: A Comparison between Two Reflective Analysis Styles with/without a Graphical Record of Strengths/Weaknesses

被引:5
|
作者
Escribano Sanchez, Guillermo [1 ]
Ruzafa-Martinez, Maria [2 ]
Leal-Costa, Cesar [2 ]
Diaz-Agea, Jose Luis [1 ]
Ramos-Morcillo, Antonio Jesus [2 ]
Garcia Sanchez, Alfonso [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Catolica Murcia, Fac Nursing, Murcia 30107, Spain
[2] Univ Murcia, Fac Nursing, Murcia 30100, Spain
关键词
debriefing; clinical simulation; learning strategies; motivation; nursing; SIMULATION; EDUCATION;
D O I
10.3390/healthcare9020130
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Clinical simulation efficiently complements the training of Nursing Degree students. The debriefing phase is the most important feature of simulation-based learning, where the students are able to acquire the necessary competences. It is at this stage where learning strategies and motivation play a crucial role. The objective of the study was to analyze the relationship between the style of debriefing utilized in the simulation sessions, and the learning strategies of Nursing Degree students who participated in a high-fidelity clinical simulation. Method: This was a quasi-experimental study conducted with a sample of 200 students in their third and fourth years at university. To obtain the data, an evaluation Questionnaire for the Evaluation of Learning Strategies of University Students (CEVEAPEU) was utilized, as well as two different types of structured debriefing styles, namely, with or without a graphical representation of the strengths/weaknesses during the analytical phase. The data analysis was performed with the SPSS(R) v25 program. Results: Statistically significant differences were found, with higher scores obtained when utilizing debriefing with a graphical representation, on both scales of the questionnaire (affective and cognitive), on the motivational, metacognitive and processing, and use of information subscales, and twelve learning strategies mostly belonging to the subscales of motivation; searching, collecting, and selecting information; and processing and using information. Conclusion: Debriefing with a graphical representation is deemed, a priori, as the most adequate approach for our context, based on the greater number of learning strategies utilized by our students. The use of a written graphical record of the strengths and weaknesses in the analytical phase is recommended.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 3 条
  • [1] ANALYSIS OF TWO HIGHER EDUCATION CENTRES WHICH INCORPORATE TEACHING STRATEGIES AND LEARNING STYLES TO THE EDUCATIONAL PROCESS
    Gutierrez Tapias, Mariano
    Garcia Cue, Jose Luis
    JOURNAL OF LEARNING STYLES, 2014, 7 (13): : 45 - 63
  • [2] Medical students' attitudes toward communication skills learning: comparison between two groups with and without training
    Ruiz Moral, Roger
    Garcia de Leonardo, Cristina
    Caballero Martinez, Fernando
    Monge Martin, Diana
    ADVANCES IN MEDICAL EDUCATION AND PRACTICE, 2019, 10 : 55 - 61
  • [3] Investigating the Relationship between Instructors' Use of Active-Learning Strategies and Students' Conceptual Understanding and Affective Changes in Introductory Biology: A Comparison of Two Active-Learning Environments
    Cleveland, Lacy M.
    Olimpo, Jeffrey T.
    DeChenne-Peters, Sue Ellen
    CBE-LIFE SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2017, 16 (02):