Prototype of Augmented Reality Technology for Orthodontic Bracket Positioning: An In Vivo Study

被引:4
作者
Lo, Yu-Cheng [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Chen, Guan-An [4 ]
Liu, Yin-Chun [4 ]
Chen, Yuan-Hou [2 ]
Hsu, Jui-Ting [1 ,5 ]
Yu, Jian-Hong [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] China Med Univ, Sch Dent, Coll Dent, Taichung 404, Taiwan
[2] China Med Univ, Dept Orthodont, Hosp Med Ctr, Taichung 404, Taiwan
[3] Asia Univ Hosp, Dept Dent, Taichung 413, Taiwan
[4] Ind Technol Res Inst, Intelligent Med & Healthcare Syst Dept, Serv Syst Technol Ctr, Hsinchu 310, Taiwan
[5] Asia Univ, Dept Bioinformat & Med Engn, Taichung 413, Taiwan
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2021年 / 11卷 / 05期
基金
中国博士后科学基金; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
augmented reality; orthodontic; bracket navigation system; bracket positioning; TRANSFER ACCURACY; PLACEMENT;
D O I
10.3390/app11052315
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
To improve the accuracy of bracket placement in vivo, a protocol and device were introduced, which consisted of operative procedures for accurate control, a computer-aided design, and an augmented reality-assisted bracket navigation system. The present study evaluated the accuracy of this protocol. Methods: Thirty-one incisor teeth were tested from four participators. The teeth were bonded by novice and expert orthodontists. Compared with the control group by Boone gauge and the experiment group by augmented reality-assisted bracket navigation system, our study used for brackets measurement. To evaluate the accuracy, deviations of positions for bracket placement were measured. Results: The augmented reality-assisted bracket navigation system and control group were used in the same 31 cases. The priority of bonding brackets between control group or experiment group was decided by tossing coins, and then the teeth were debonded and the other technique was used. The medium vertical (incisogingival) position deviation in the control and AR groups by the novice orthodontist was 0.90 +/- 0.06 mm and 0.51 +/- 0.24 mm, respectively (p < 0.05), and by the expert orthodontist was 0.40 +/- 0.29 mm and 0.29 +/- 0.08 mm, respectively (p < 0.05). No significant changes in the horizontal position deviation were noted regardless of the orthodontist experience or use of the augmented reality-assisted bracket navigation system. Conclusion: The augmented reality-assisted bracket navigation system increased the accuracy rate by the expert orthodontist in the incisogingival direction and helped the novice orthodontist guide the bracket position within an acceptable clinical error of approximately 0.5 mm.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 13
页数:13
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Aichert A, 2012, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V7511, P601, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-33418-4_74
  • [2] Al-Falahy N, 2017, IT PROF, V19, P12, DOI 10.1109/MITP.2017.9
  • [3] Andrews L F, 1976, J Clin Orthod, V10, P581
  • [4] Andrews L F, 1976, J Clin Orthod, V10, P174
  • [5] Andrews L F, 1976, J Clin Orthod, V10, P99
  • [6] Andrews L F, 1979, Br J Orthod, V6, P125
  • [7] 6 KEYS TO NORMAL OCCLUSION
    ANDREWS, LF
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 1972, 62 (03): : 296 - &
  • [8] [Anonymous], 1992, P 25 HAW INT C SYST, DOI [10.1109/HICSS.1992.183317, DOI 10.1109/HICSS.1992.183317]
  • [9] VARIATIONS IN BRACKET PLACEMENT IN THE PREADJUSTED ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCE
    BALUT, N
    KLAPPER, L
    SANDRIK, J
    BOWMAN, D
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1992, 102 (01) : 62 - 67
  • [10] Objective grading system for dental casts and panoramic radiographs
    Casko, JS
    Vaden, JL
    Kokich, VG
    Damone, J
    James, RD
    Cangialosi, TJ
    Riolo, ML
    Owens, SE
    Bills, ED
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1998, 114 (05) : 589 - 599