Appropriateness measurement: application to advice-giving in community pharmacies

被引:34
作者
Bissell, P [1 ]
Ward, PR [1 ]
Noyce, PR [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Sch Pharm & Pharmaceut Sci, Drug Usage & Pharm Practice Grp, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
关键词
appropriateness; community pharmacy; variation; advice-giving; consensus techniques;
D O I
10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00458-X
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Awareness of variations in the delivery of medical care has resulted in considerable research activity focused on developing measures to assess the appropriateness of health service provision both internationally and within Great Britain. As in other areas of health service provision there is evidence of variation in advice provided alongside sales of non-prescription medicines and variation in response to requests for advice about the treatment of minor ailments within community pharmacies in Great Britain. However, there is little research which has explored the extensive methodological problems associated with developing criteria to assess the appropriateness of these two activities. Following a critical review of relevant existing research, this paper describes a methodology and empirical findings from a study which aimed to develop criteria to measure the appropriateness of advice provided in community pharmacies. Firstly, details of advice-giving episodes occurring between consumers and pharmacists or medicines counter assistants were captured and documented using a combination of audio tape-recording and non-participant observation. Secondly, the nominal group technique was used to develop a set of explicit criteria for assessing the appropriateness of advice. Thirdly, an assessment instrument was developed in order to operationalise the criteria. The devised criteria include both process and output components. We discuss the utility of these criteria in relation to developments in self-medication practice affecting community pharmacy and the deregulation of medicines within the UK. The criteria have been subject to rigorous statistical testing to establish standards of validity and reliability (Ward, Bissell & Noyce, 2000a [Ward, P. R., Bissell, P. & Noyce, P. R. (1000a); Criteria for assessing non-prescription drug therapy in community pharmacy, Annuls of Pharmacotherapy (in press).]). The developed criteria will allow us to identify dimensions of both appropriate and inappropriate advice provided in community pharmacies and provide the basis for education and training initiatives identified as a result of the research. In addition, we suggest that this research is highly relevant to informing the content, structure and operationalisation of protocols and/or guidelines associated with the management of minor ailments and the sale of medicines through community pharmacies. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:343 / 359
页数:17
相关论文
共 100 条
  • [51] A comparison of a Patient Enablement instrument (PEI) against two established satisfaction scales as an outcome measure of primary care consultations
    Howie, JGR
    Heaney, DJ
    Maxwell, M
    Walker, JJ
    [J]. FAMILY PRACTICE, 1998, 15 (02) : 165 - 171
  • [52] APPROPRIATE INDICATIONS FOR PROSTATECTOMY IN THE UK - RESULTS OF A CONSENSUS PANEL
    HUNTER, DJW
    MCKEE, CM
    SANDERSON, CFB
    BLACK, NA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 1994, 48 (01) : 58 - 64
  • [53] CONSENSUS METHODS FOR MEDICAL AND HEALTH-SERVICES RESEARCH
    JONES, J
    HUNTER, D
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 311 (7001) : 376 - 380
  • [54] Variations by specialty in physician ratings of the appropriateness and necessity of indications for procedures
    Kahan, JP
    Park, RE
    Leape, LL
    Bernstein, SJ
    Hilborne, LH
    Parker, L
    Kamberg, CJ
    Ballard, DJ
    Brook, RH
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 1996, 34 (06) : 512 - 523
  • [55] MEASURING THE CLINICAL APPROPRIATENESS OF THE USE OF A PROCEDURE - CAN WE DO IT
    KAHN, KL
    KOSECOFF, J
    CHASSIN, MR
    FLYNN, MF
    FINK, A
    PATTAPHONGSE, N
    SOLOMON, DH
    BROOK, RH
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 1988, 26 (04) : 415 - 422
  • [56] THE QUALITY OF CARE AND THE QUALITY OF MEASURING IT
    KASSIRER, JP
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1993, 329 (17) : 1263 - 1265
  • [57] KRAAN H, 1989, COMMUNICATING MED PA
  • [58] KRSKA J, 1994, PHARM J, V252, P93
  • [59] Krska J, 1996, PHARM J, V256, P354
  • [60] DOES INAPPROPRIATE USE EXPLAIN SMALL-AREA VARIATIONS IN THE USE OF HEALTH-CARE SERVICES
    LEAPE, LL
    PARK, RE
    SOLOMON, DH
    CHASSIN, MR
    KOSECOFF, J
    BROOK, RH
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1990, 263 (05): : 669 - 672