Estimating Impact Forces of Tail Club Strikes by Ankylosaurid Dinosaurs

被引:47
作者
Arbour, Victoria Megan
机构
[1] Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB
来源
PLOS ONE | 2009年 / 4卷 / 08期
关键词
SEXUAL SELECTION; NECK; MECHANICS; ALLIGATOR; HEAD;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0006738
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: It has been assumed that the unusual tail club of ankylosaurid dinosaurs was used actively as a weapon, but the biological feasibility of this behaviour has not been examined in detail. Ankylosaurid tail clubs are composed of interlocking vertebrae, which form the handle, and large terminal osteoderms, which form the knob. Methodology/Principal Findings: Computed tomographic (CT) scans of several ankylosaurid tail clubs referred to Dyoplosaurus and Euoplocephalus, combined with measurements of free caudal vertebrae, provide information used to estimate the impact force of tail clubs of various sizes. Ankylosaurid tails are modeled as a series of segments for which mass, muscle cross-sectional area, torque, and angular acceleration are calculated. Free caudal vertebrae segments had limited vertical flexibility, but the tail could have swung through approximately 100 degrees laterally. Muscle scars on the pelvis record the presence of a large M. longissimus caudae, and ossified tendons alongside the handle represent M. spinalis. CT scans showed that knob osteoderms were predominantly cancellous, which would have lowered the rotational inertia of the tail club and made it easier to wield as a weapon. Conclusions/Significance: Large knobs could generate sufficient force to break bone during impacts, but average and small knobs could not. Tail swinging behaviour is feasible in ankylosaurids, but it remains unknown whether the tail was used for interspecific defense, intraspecific combat, or both.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [1] Tail blow energy and carapace fractures in a large glyptodont (Mammalia, Xenarthra)
    Alexander, RM
    Fariña, RA
    Vizcaíno, SF
    [J]. ZOOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY, 1999, 126 (01) : 41 - 49
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2002, Bones: Structure and Mechanics
  • [3] ARBOUR VM, 1924, J VERTEBR P IN PRESS
  • [4] Evaluation of the strength-size relationship in vivo using various muscle size indices
    Bamman, MM
    Newcomer, BR
    Larson-Meyer, DE
    Weinsier, RL
    Hunter, GR
    [J]. MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2000, 32 (07) : 1307 - 1313
  • [5] Carpenter K, 2005, LIFE O PAST, P325
  • [6] Chiasson R.B., 1962, LAB ANATOMY ALLIGATO
  • [7] DYNAMIC PROPERTIES OF MAMMALIAN SKELETAL-MUSCLES
    CLOSE, RI
    [J]. PHYSIOLOGICAL REVIEWS, 1972, 52 (01) : 129 - +
  • [8] Cong LY., 1998, The Gross Anatomy of Alligator Sinensis Fauvel
  • [9] Coombs W, 1971, THESIS COLUMBIA U NE
  • [10] COOMBS WP, 1979, J PALEONTOL, V53, P666