Emulsifying and Foaming Properties of Commercial Yellow Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Seed Flours

被引:154
|
作者
Aluko, Rotimi E. [1 ,2 ]
Mofolasayo, Olawunmi A. [1 ]
Watts, Beverley A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manitoba, Dept Human Nutr Sci, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada
[2] Univ Manitoba, Richardson Ctr Funct Foods & Nutraceut, Winnipeg, MB R3T 6C5, Canada
关键词
Pea; seed flour; soybean; protein isolate; starch; emulsion; foaming; COWPEA VIGNA-UNGUICULATA; FUNCTIONAL-PROPERTIES; PROTEIN ISOLATE; TEXTURAL PROPERTIES; POLYSACCHARIDE; TRANSGLUTAMINASE; CONJUGATION; STARCH; HEAT; PH;
D O I
10.1021/jf902199x
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Commercial yellow pea seed flours prepared by a patented wet-milling process and pea protein isolate (PPI) were analyzed for emulsifying and-foaming properties at pH 3.0, 5.0, and 7.0 and compared to soybean protein isolate (SPI). PIPI and, SPI formed emulsions with significantly smaller (p < 0.05) oil droplet sizes, 16-30 and 23-54 mu m, respectively, than flours that primarily contained fiber such as Centara III and IV, or those that consisted mainly of starch: Centu-tex, Uptake 80 and Accu-gel. PPI was a better emulsifier than SPI at pH 7.0, and a better foaming agent at pH 3.0 and pH 7.0, although foaming capacity varied with sample concentration. Centu-tex and Uptake 80 have exactly the same chemical composition, but the latter has a much smaller flour particle size range, and had significantly smaller (p < 0.05) emulsion oil. droplets. Incorporation of pea starch into SPI emulsions produced a synergistic effect that led to significant increases (p < 0.05) in emulsification capacity (reduced emulsion oil droplet size) when compared to SPI or starch alone. These results showed that PPI had generally significantly higher (p < 0.05) emulsion and foam forming properties than SPI, and that pea starch could be used to improve the quality of SPI-stabilized food emulsions.
引用
收藏
页码:9793 / 9800
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Modelling nitrogen fixation of pea (Pisum sativum L.)
    Eckersten, H
    Af Geijersstam, L
    Torssell, B
    ACTA AGRICULTURAE SCANDINAVICA SECTION B-SOIL AND PLANT SCIENCE, 2006, 56 (02): : 129 - 137
  • [32] Analysis of pea (Pisum sativum L.) supernodulating mutants
    Sidorova, KK
    Shumnyi, VK
    GENETIKA, 1998, 34 (10): : 1452 - 1454
  • [33] Genetic control of fasciation in pea (Pisum sativum L.)
    A. A. Sinjushin
    S. A. Gostimskii
    Russian Journal of Genetics, 2008, 44 : 702 - 708
  • [34] The first record of tetrasomy in pea (Pisum sativum L.)
    Oleg E. Kosterin
    Elvira R. Galieva
    Vera S. Bogdanova
    Euphytica, 2009, 166 : 109 - 121
  • [35] SEED YIELD AND WEED INFESTATION OF PEA (Pisum sativum L.) AND SOIL PROPERTIES IN THE SYSTEMS OF CONVENTIONAL AND CONSERVATION AGRICULTURE
    Wozniak, Andrzej
    ACTA SCIENTIARUM POLONORUM-HORTORUM CULTUS, 2022, 21 (05): : 139 - 151
  • [36] Genetic control of fasciation in pea (Pisum sativum L.)
    Sinjushin, A. A.
    Gostimskii, S. A.
    RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF GENETICS, 2008, 44 (06) : 702 - 708
  • [37] Bioavailability and Rhizotoxicity of Cd to Pea (Pisum sativum L.)
    Wu, Yonghong
    Hendershot, William H.
    WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 2010, 208 (1-4): : 29 - 42
  • [38] Amino Acid Composition and Antioxidant Properties of Pea Seed (Pisum sativum L.) Enzymatic Protein Hydrolysate Fractions
    Pownall, Trisha L.
    Udenigwe, Chibuike C.
    Aluko, Rotimi E.
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2010, 58 (08) : 4712 - 4718
  • [39] Chlorophyll fluorescence for prediction of yellow lupin (Lupinus luteus L.) and pea (Pisum sativum L.) susceptibility to drought
    Juzon, K.
    Czyczylo-Mysza, I.
    Ostrowska, A.
    Marcinska, I.
    Skrzypek, E.
    PHOTOSYNTHETICA, 2019, 57 (04) : 950 - 959
  • [40] PROPERTIES OF AN AMINOTRANSFERASE OF PEA (PISUM-SATIVUM-L)
    MATHERON, ME
    MOORE, TC
    PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1973, 52 (01) : 63 - 67