Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality: Potential for Improvements in Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation

被引:20
作者
Chocron, Richard [1 ,2 ]
Jobe, Julia [3 ]
Guan, Sally [4 ]
Kim, Madeleine [5 ]
Shigemura, Mia [3 ]
Fahrenbruch, Carol [4 ]
Rea, Thomas [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Paris Univ, Paris Res Cardiovasc Ctr PARCC, INSERM, Paris, France
[2] Georges Pompidou European Hosp, AP HP, Emergency Dept, Paris, France
[3] Univ Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[4] Publ Hlth Seattle & King Cty, Emergency Med Serv Div, 401 5th Ave, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
[5] Univ Southern Calif, Los Angeles, CA 90007 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION | 2021年 / 10卷 / 06期
关键词
dispatch‐ assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation; out of hospital cardiac arrest; quality in health care; telecommunicator cardiopulmonary resuscitation; PUBLIC-ACCESS DEFIBRILLATION; SURVIVAL; CPR;
D O I
10.1161/JAHA.120.017930
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is a critical intervention to improve survival following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. We evaluated the quality of bystander CPR and whether performance varied according to the number of bystanders or provision of telecommunicator CPR (TCPR). Methods and Results We investigated non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest occurring in a large metropolitan emergency medical system during a 6-month period. Information about bystander care was ascertained through review of the 9-1-1 recordings in addition to emergency medical system and hospital records to determine bystander CPR status (none versus TCPR versus unassisted), the number of bystanders on-scene, and CPR performance metrics of compression fraction and compression rate. Of the 428 eligible out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, 76.4% received bystander CPR including 43.7% unassisted CPR and 56.3% TCPR; 35.2% had one bystander, 33.3% had 2 bystanders, and 31.5% had >= 3 bystanders. Overall compression fraction was 59% with a compression rate of 88 per minute. CPR differed according to TCPR status (fraction=52%, rate=87 per minute for TCPR versus fraction=69%, rate=102 for unassisted CPR, P<0.05 for each comparison) and the number of bystanders (fraction=55%, rate=87 per minute for 1 bystander, fraction=59%, rate=89 for 2 bystanders, fraction=65%, rate=97 for >= 3 bystanders, test for trend P<0.05 for each metric). Additional bystander actions were uncommon to include rotation of compressors (3.1%) or application of an automated external defibrillator (8.0%). Conclusions Bystander CPR quality as gauged by compression fraction and rate approached guideline goals though performance depended upon the type of CPR and number of bystanders.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2021, J AM HEART ASSOC, V10, DOI [10.1161/JAHA.120.017930, DOI 10.1161/JAHA.120.017930]
  • [2] The Effects of Public Access Defibrillation on Survival After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest A Systematic Review of Observational Studies
    Baekgaard, Josefine S.
    Viereck, Soren
    Moller, Thea Palsgaard
    Ersboll, Annette Kjaer
    Lippert, Freddy
    Folke, Fredrik
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2017, 136 (10) : 954 - +
  • [3] Benjamin EJ, 2019, CIRCULATION, V139, pE56, DOI [10.1161/CIR.0000000000000659, 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000746]
  • [4] A standardized template for measuring and reporting telephone pre-arrival cardiopulmonary resuscitation instructions
    Dameff, Christian
    Vadeboncoeur, Tyler
    Tully, Jeffrey
    Panczyk, Micah
    Dunham, Aaron
    Murphy, Ryan
    Stolz, Uwe
    Chikani, Vatsal
    Spaite, Daniel
    Bobrow, Bentley
    [J]. RESUSCITATION, 2014, 85 (07) : 869 - 873
  • [5] Long-Term Prognostic Value of Gasping During Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
    Debaty, Guillaume
    Labarere, Jose
    Frascone, Ralph J.
    Wayne, Marvin A.
    Swor, Robert A.
    Mahoney, Brian D.
    Domeier, Robert M.
    Olinger, Michael L.
    O'Neil, Brian J.
    Yannopoulos, Demetris
    Aufderheide, Tom P.
    Lurie, Keith G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 70 (12) : 1467 - 1476
  • [6] Improving emergency call detection of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrests in the Greater Paris area: Efficiency of a global system with a new method of detection
    Derkenne, Clement
    Jost, Daniel
    Thabouillot, Oscar
    Briche, Frederique
    Travers, Stephane
    Frattini, Benoit
    Lesaffre, Xavier
    Kedzierewicz, Romain
    Roquet, Florian
    de Charry, Felicite
    Prunet, Bertrand
    Lemoine, Frederic
    Lanoe, Vincent
    Gauyat, Eric
    Lemoine, Sabine
    Briche, Frederic
    Alhanati, Laure
    Freiermuth, Jean-Paul
    Delhaye, Ludovic
    Maurin, Olga
    Prieux, Laurent
    Yavari, Olivier
    Hong, Vivien
    Stibbe, Olivier
    [J]. RESUSCITATION, 2020, 146 : 34 - 42
  • [7] Analysis of bystander CPR quality during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest using data derived from automated external defibrillators
    Fernando, Shannon M.
    Vaillancourt, Christian
    Morrow, Stanley
    Stiell, Ian G.
    [J]. RESUSCITATION, 2018, 128 : 138 - 143
  • [8] Quality of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation during real-life out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
    Gyllenborg, Tore
    Granfeldt, Asger
    Lippert, Freddy
    Riddervold, Ingunn Skogstad
    Folke, Fredrik
    [J]. RESUSCITATION, 2017, 120 : 63 - 70
  • [9] Dispatcher-assisted bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation and survival in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
    Hagihara, Akihito
    Onozuka, Daisuke
    Shibuta, Hidetoshi
    Hasegawa, Manabu
    Nagata, Takashi
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 265 : 240 - 245
  • [10] Effectiveness of dispatcher instructions-dependent or independent bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation on neurological survival among patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
    Hatakeyama, Toshihiro
    Kiguchi, Takeyuki
    Kobayashi, Daisuke
    Nakamura, Naotoshi
    Nishiyama, Chika
    Hayashida, Sumito
    Kiyohara, Kosuke
    Kitamura, Tetsuhisa
    Kawamura, Takashi
    Iwami, Taku
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 75 (03) : 315 - 322