Measurement of Sepsis in a National Cohort Using Three Different Methods to Define Baseline Organ Function

被引:9
作者
Wayne, Max T. [1 ]
Molling, Daniel [2 ]
Wang, Xiao Qing [1 ,2 ]
Hogan, Cainnear K. [2 ]
Seelye, Sarah [2 ]
Liu, Vincent X. [3 ]
Prescott, Hallie C. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Internal Med, Div Pulm & Crit Care Med, 1500 East Med Ctr Dr,SPC 5361, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] VA Ctr Clin Management Res, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[3] Kaiser Permanente Northern Calif, Div Res, Oakland, CA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
sepsis; epidemiology; infections; electronic health records; GOAL-DIRECTED RESUSCITATION; UNITED-STATES; CARE; TRENDS; DEFINITIONS; VALIDATION; DIAGNOSIS; ACCURACY; CRITERIA; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1513/AnnalsATS.202009-1130OC
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Rationale: In 2017, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) developed a new surveillance definition of sepsis, the adult sepsis event (ASE), to better track sepsis epidemiology. The ASE, requires evidence of acute organ dysfunction and defines baseline organ function pragmatically as the best in-hospital value. This approach may undercount sepsis if new organ dysfunction does not resolve by discharge. Objectives: To understand how sepsis identification and outcomes differ when using the best laboratory values during hospitalization versus methods that use historical lookbacks to define baseline organ function. Methods: We identified all patients hospitalized at 138 Veterans Affairs hospitals (2013-2018) admitted via the emergency department with two or more systemic inflammatory response criteria, were treated with antibiotics within 48 hours (i.e., had potential infection), and completed 4+ days of antibiotics (i.e., had suspected infection). We considered the following three approaches to defining baseline renal, hematologic, and liver function: the best values during hospitalization (as in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's ASE), the best values during hospitalization plus the prior 90 days (3-mo baseline), and the best values during hospitalization plus the prior 180 days (6-mo baseline). We determined how many patients met the criteria for sepsis by each approach, and then compared characteristics and outcomes of sepsis hospitalizations between the three approaches. Results: Among 608,128 hospitalizations with potential infection, 72.1%, 68.5%, and 58.4% had creatinine, platelet, and total bilirubin measured, respectively, in the prior 3 months. A total of 86.0%, 82.6%, and 74.8%, respectively, had these labs in the prior 6 months. Using the hospital baseline, 100,568 hospitalizations met criteria for community-acquired sepsis. By contrast, 111,983 and 117,435 met criteria for sepsis using the 3- and 6-month baselines, for a relative increase of 11% and 17%, respectively. Patient characteristics were similar across the three approaches. In-hospital mortality was 7.2%, 7.0%, and 6.8% for sepsis hospitalizations identified using the hospital, 3-month baseline, and 6-month baseline. The 30-day mortality was 12.5%, 12.7%, and 12.5%, respectively. Conclusions: Among veterans hospitalized with potential infection, the majority had laboratory values in the prior 6 months. Using 3- and 6-month lookbacks to define baseline organ function resulted in an 11% and 17% relative increase, respectively, in the number of sepsis hospitalizations identified.
引用
收藏
页码:648 / 655
页数:8
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2018, P INT C LEARN REPR
  • [2] DEFINITIONS FOR SEPSIS AND ORGAN FAILURE AND GUIDELINES FOR THE USE OF INNOVATIVE THERAPIES IN SEPSIS
    BONE, RC
    BALK, RA
    CERRA, FB
    DELLINGER, RP
    FEIN, AM
    KNAUS, WA
    SCHEIN, RMH
    SIBBALD, WJ
    [J]. CHEST, 1992, 101 (06) : 1644 - 1655
  • [3] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2018, HOSP TOOLK AD SEPS S
  • [4] Department of Veterans Affairs, 2014, CORP DAT WAR CDW
  • [5] Electronic health record-based clinical decision support alert for severe sepsis: a randomised evaluation
    Downing, Norman Lance
    Rolnick, Joshua
    Poole, Sarah F.
    Hall, Evan
    Wessels, Alexander J.
    Heidenreich, Paul
    Shieh, Lisa
    [J]. BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2019, 28 (09) : 762 - 768
  • [6] Benchmarking the Incidence and Mortality of Severe Sepsis in the United States
    Gaieski, David F.
    Edwards, J. Matthew
    Kallan, Michael J.
    Carr, Brendan G.
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2013, 41 (05) : 1167 - 1174
  • [7] Quantifying the improvement in sepsis diagnosis, documentation, and coding: the marginal causal effect of year of hospitalization on sepsis diagnosis
    Jafarzadeh, S. Reza
    Thomas, Benjamin S.
    Marschall, Jonas
    Fraser, Victoria J.
    Gill, Jeff
    Warren, David K.
    [J]. ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2016, 26 (01) : 66 - 70
  • [8] Variability of Creatinine Measurements in Clinical Laboratories: Results from the CRIC Study
    Joffe, Marshall
    Hsu, Chi-Yuan
    Feldman, Harold I.
    Weir, Matthew
    Landis, J. R.
    Hamm, L. Lee
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEPHROLOGY, 2010, 31 (05) : 426 - 434
  • [9] A Comparative Analysis of Sepsis Identification Methods in an Electronic Database
    Johnson, Alistair E. W.
    Aboab, Jerome
    Raffa, Jesse D.
    Pollard, Tom J.
    Deliberato, Rodrigo O.
    Celi, Leo A.
    Stone, David J.
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2018, 46 (04) : 494 - 499
  • [10] Accuracy of Platelet Counting by Automated Hematologic Analyzers in Acute Leukemia and Disseminated lntravascular Coagulation Potential Effects of Platelet Activation
    Kim, Seon Young
    Kim, Ji-Eun
    Kim, Hyun Kyung
    Han, Kyou-Sup
    Toh, Cheng Hock
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2010, 134 (04) : 634 - 647