Understanding cryptocurrency volatility: The role of oil market shocks

被引:54
作者
Yin, Libo [1 ]
Nie, Jing [1 ]
Han, Liyan [2 ]
机构
[1] Cent Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Finance, Shahe Higher Educ Pk, Beijing 102206, Peoples R China
[2] Beihang Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Oil market shocks; Cryptocurrency volatility; Macroeconomic uncertainty; Safe haven; PRICE SHOCKS; SAFE HAVEN; BITCOIN; GOLD; UNCERTAINTY; HEDGE; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.iref.2020.11.013
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This study employs the generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity-mixed data sample framework to examine the role of oil market shocks in determining the long-term volatility of cryptocurrencies. We analyzed three cryptocurrencies, namely, Bitcoin, Ethereum, and XRP, and six oil market shocks, namely, oil price return (OR), oil realized volatility (ORV), oil realized skewness (ORSV), oil supply shocks (OSS), and oil demand shocks [global aggregate demand for industrial commodities (OADS) and crude oil market demand shocks (OSDS)]. The empirical results of the study reveal that OR, ORV, ORSV, and the two types of oil demand shocks (OADS and OSDS) and OSS have negative and positive impacts, respectively, on the long-term volatility of cryptocurrencies. We further gained insights on the economic underpinnings and observed that the ability of the oil market shocks to signal the uncertainty of the macroeconomic environment is clearly the most important source of its negative and significant impact on the volatility of cryptocurrencies. Moreover, an adverse oil market shock increases the attractiveness of cryptocurrencies, as they could provide shelter from sovereign risk and weakness. Overall, our study highlights a clear and comprehensive understanding of the association between the oil market risk and the cryptocurrency volatility dynamic and the possibility for cryptocurrencies to act as a hedge under specific uncertain economic conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:233 / 253
页数:21
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]   The relationship between implied volatility and cryptocurrency returns [J].
Akyildirim, Erdinc ;
Corbet, Shaen ;
Lucey, Brian ;
Sensoy, Ahmet ;
Yarovaya, Larisa .
FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 33
[2]  
Al-Khazali O, 2018, ECON BULL, V38, P373
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, THESIS ERASMUS U ROT
[4]   Regime changes in Bitcoin GARCH volatility dynamics [J].
Ardia, David ;
Bluteau, Keven ;
Ruede, Maxime .
FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2019, 29 :266-271
[5]   Real-Time Measurement of Business Conditions [J].
Aruoba, S. Boragan ;
Diebold, Francis X. ;
Scotti, Chiara .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & ECONOMIC STATISTICS, 2009, 27 (04) :417-427
[6]   Measuring Economic Policy Uncertainty [J].
Baker, Scott R. ;
Bloom, Nicholas ;
Davis, Steven J. .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2016, 131 (04) :1593-1636
[7]   Some stylized facts of the Bitcoin market [J].
Bariviera, Aurelio F. ;
Basgall, Maria Jose ;
Hasperue, Waldo ;
Naiouf, Marcelo .
PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2017, 484 :82-90
[8]   Monetary Policy Responses to Oil Price Fluctuations [J].
Bodenstein, Martin ;
Guerrieri, Luca ;
Kilian, Lutz .
IMF ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2012, 60 (04) :470-504
[9]   GENERALIZED AUTOREGRESSIVE CONDITIONAL HETEROSKEDASTICITY [J].
BOLLERSLEV, T .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 1986, 31 (03) :307-327
[10]  
Bouoiyour J, 2016, ECON BULL, V36, P843