An Overview of Scoring Functions Used for Protein-Ligand Interactions in Molecular Docking

被引:278
作者
Li, Jin [1 ,2 ]
Fu, Ailing [3 ]
Zhang, Le [1 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Southwest Univ, Coll Comp & Informat Sci, Chongqing 400715, Peoples R China
[2] Southwest Med Univ, Sch Med Informat & Engn, Luzhou 646000, Peoples R China
[3] Southwest Univ, Coll Pharmaceut Sci, Chongqing 400715, Peoples R China
[4] Sichuan Univ, Coll Comp Sci, Chengdu 610065, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[5] Sichuan Univ, Med Big Data Ctr, Chengdu 610065, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[6] Informat Polytron Technol Inc Chongqing, Zdmed, Chongqing 401320, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Molecular docking; Scoring function; Ligand pose; Binding affinity; Protein-ligand interaction; BINDING-AFFINITY PREDICTION; FREE-ENERGY; GENETIC ALGORITHM; RANDOM FOREST; WATER-MOLECULES; FORCE-FIELD; COMPLEXES; LEAD; OPTIMIZATION; DISCOVERY;
D O I
10.1007/s12539-019-00327-w
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Currently, molecular docking is becoming a key tool in drug discovery and molecular modeling applications. The reliability of molecular docking depends on the accuracy of the adopted scoring function, which can guide and determine the ligand poses when thousands of possible poses of ligand are generated. The scoring function can be used to determine the binding mode and site of a ligand, predict binding affinity and identify the potential drug leads for a given protein target. Despite intensive research over the years, accurate and rapid prediction of protein-ligand interactions is still a challenge in molecular docking. For this reason, this study reviews four basic types of scoring functions, physics-based, empirical, knowledge-based, and machine learning-based scoring functions, based on an up-to-date classification scheme. We not only discuss the foundations of the four types scoring functions, suitable application areas and shortcomings, but also discuss challenges and potential future study directions.
引用
收藏
页码:320 / 328
页数:9
相关论文
共 120 条
[91]   QM/MM Methods for Biomolecular Systems [J].
Senn, Hans Martin ;
Thiel, Walter .
ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION, 2009, 48 (07) :1198-1229
[92]   A Genetic Algorithm- Back Propagation Artificial Neural Network Model to Quantify the Affinity of Flavonoids Toward P-Glycoprotein [J].
Shen, Jibin ;
Cui, Ying ;
Gu, Jun ;
Li, Yaxiao ;
Li, Lingzhi .
COMBINATORIAL CHEMISTRY & HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING, 2014, 17 (02) :162-172
[93]   GalaxyDock2: Protein-Ligand Docking Using Beta-Complex and Global Optimization [J].
Shin, Woong-Hee ;
Kim, Jae-Kwan ;
Kim, Deok-Soo ;
Seok, Chaok .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY, 2013, 34 (30) :2647-2656
[94]   SFCscore: Scoring functions for affinity prediction of protein-ligand complexes [J].
Sotriffer, Christoph A. ;
Sanschagrin, Paul ;
Matter, Hans ;
Klebe, Gerhard .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2008, 73 (02) :395-419
[95]   Relative Ligand-Binding Free Energies Calculated from Multiple Short QM/MM MD Simulations [J].
Steinmann, Casper ;
Olsson, Martin A. ;
Ryde, Ulf .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION, 2018, 14 (06) :3228-3237
[96]  
Stepniewska-Dziubinska MM, 2018, BIOINFORMATICS
[97]   Finding chemical drugs for genetic diseases [J].
Sun, Hui-Yong ;
Hou, Ting-Jun ;
Zhang, Hong-Yu .
DRUG DISCOVERY TODAY, 2014, 19 (12) :1836-1840
[98]   Insight into Crizotinib Resistance Mechanisms Caused by Three Mutations in ALK Tyrosine Kinase using Free Energy Calculation Approaches [J].
Sun, Huiyong ;
Li, Youyong ;
Li, Dan ;
Hou, Tingjun .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2013, 53 (09) :2376-2389
[99]   A new concept for multidimensional selection of ligand conformations (MultiSelect) and multidimensional scoring (MultiScore) of protein-ligand binding affinities [J].
Terp, GE ;
Johansen, BN ;
Christensen, IT ;
Jorgensen, FS .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2001, 44 (14) :2333-2343
[100]  
Thornton BF, 2017, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V43, P24