An Overview of Scoring Functions Used for Protein-Ligand Interactions in Molecular Docking

被引:278
作者
Li, Jin [1 ,2 ]
Fu, Ailing [3 ]
Zhang, Le [1 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Southwest Univ, Coll Comp & Informat Sci, Chongqing 400715, Peoples R China
[2] Southwest Med Univ, Sch Med Informat & Engn, Luzhou 646000, Peoples R China
[3] Southwest Univ, Coll Pharmaceut Sci, Chongqing 400715, Peoples R China
[4] Sichuan Univ, Coll Comp Sci, Chengdu 610065, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[5] Sichuan Univ, Med Big Data Ctr, Chengdu 610065, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[6] Informat Polytron Technol Inc Chongqing, Zdmed, Chongqing 401320, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Molecular docking; Scoring function; Ligand pose; Binding affinity; Protein-ligand interaction; BINDING-AFFINITY PREDICTION; FREE-ENERGY; GENETIC ALGORITHM; RANDOM FOREST; WATER-MOLECULES; FORCE-FIELD; COMPLEXES; LEAD; OPTIMIZATION; DISCOVERY;
D O I
10.1007/s12539-019-00327-w
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Currently, molecular docking is becoming a key tool in drug discovery and molecular modeling applications. The reliability of molecular docking depends on the accuracy of the adopted scoring function, which can guide and determine the ligand poses when thousands of possible poses of ligand are generated. The scoring function can be used to determine the binding mode and site of a ligand, predict binding affinity and identify the potential drug leads for a given protein target. Despite intensive research over the years, accurate and rapid prediction of protein-ligand interactions is still a challenge in molecular docking. For this reason, this study reviews four basic types of scoring functions, physics-based, empirical, knowledge-based, and machine learning-based scoring functions, based on an up-to-date classification scheme. We not only discuss the foundations of the four types scoring functions, suitable application areas and shortcomings, but also discuss challenges and potential future study directions.
引用
收藏
页码:320 / 328
页数:9
相关论文
共 120 条
[1]  
Afifi K, 2018, CHEM BIOL DRUG DESIG
[2]   Machine-learning scoring functions to improve structure-based binding affinity prediction and virtual screening [J].
Ain, Qurrat Ul ;
Aleksandrova, Antoniya ;
Roessler, Florian D. ;
Ballester, Pedro J. .
WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-COMPUTATIONAL MOLECULAR SCIENCE, 2015, 5 (06) :405-424
[3]   Boosted neural networks scoring functions for accurate ligand docking and ranking [J].
Ashtawy, Hossam M. ;
Mahapatra, Nihar R. .
JOURNAL OF BIOINFORMATICS AND COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2018, 16 (02)
[4]   BgN-Score and BsN-Score: Bagging and boosting based ensemble neural networks scoring functions for accurate binding affinity prediction of protein-ligand complexes [J].
Ashtawy, Hossam M. ;
Mahapatra, Nihar R. .
BMC BIOINFORMATICS, 2015, 16
[5]   GalaxyDock BP2 score: a hybrid scoring function for accurate protein-ligand docking [J].
Baek, Minkyung ;
Shin, Woong-Hee ;
Chung, Hwan Won ;
Seok, Chaok .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2017, 31 (07) :653-666
[6]   Does a More Precise Chemical Description of Protein-Ligand Complexes Lead to More Accurate Prediction of Binding Affinity? [J].
Ballester, Pedro J. ;
Schreyer, Adrian ;
Blundell, Tom L. .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2014, 54 (03) :944-955
[7]  
Ballester PJ, 2010, MACHINE LEARNING APP
[8]   SeleX-CS: A New Consensus Scoring Algorithm for Hit Discovery and Lead Optimization [J].
Bar-Haim, Shay ;
Aharon, Ayelet ;
Ben-Moshe, Tal ;
Marantz, Yael ;
Senderowitz, Hanoch .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2009, 49 (03) :623-633
[9]  
Bengio Y, 2013, IEEE T PATTERN ANAL, V35, P31
[10]   GFscore:: A general nonlinear consensus scoring function for high-throughput docking [J].
Betzi, Stephane ;
Suhre, Karsten ;
Chetrit, Bernard ;
Guerlesquin, Francoise ;
Morelli, Xavier .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2006, 46 (04) :1704-1712