Use of 3.0-T MR Imaging for Evaluation of the Abdomen

被引:43
作者
Erturk, Sukru Mehmet [2 ]
Alberich-Bayarri, Angel [3 ]
Herrmann, Karin A. [4 ]
Marti-Bonmati, Luis [3 ]
Ros, Pablo R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Case Western Reserve Univ, Univ Hosp Case Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[2] Sisli Etfal Training & Res Hosp, Dept Radiol, Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Hosp Quiron Valencia, Dept Radiol, Valencia, Spain
[4] Univ Munich, Univ Hosp, Inst Clin Radiol, Munich, Germany
关键词
1.5; T; RENAL-ARTERIES; LIVER; COIL; COLONOGRAPHY; SPECTROSCOPY; ANGIOGRAPHY; HOMOGENEITY; FREQUENCY; SEQUENCES;
D O I
10.1148/rg.296095516
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The most important advantage of 3.0-T magnetic resonance (MR) imaging systems is their increased signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) compared with 1.5-T systems. The higher SNR can be used to shorten acquisition time, achieve higher spatial resolution, or a combination of the two, thereby improving image quality and clinical diagnosis. In fact, 3.0-T MR imaging systems have already proved superior to 1.5-T systems in neuroradiologic and musculoskeletal applications. In the abdomen, 3.0-T MR imaging is uniquely beneficial for techniques such as enhanced and nonenhanced hepatic imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, angiography, MR pancreatography, and colonography. Admittedly, 3.0-T abdominal imaging has important technical limitations, such as standing wave artifact, chemical shift artifact, susceptibility artifact, and safety issues such as increased energy deposition within the patient's body. Furthermore, 3.0-T abdominal MR imaging is still in the early stages of development and requires substantial modifications of the pulse sequences and hardware components used for 1.5-T imaging. Nevertheless, the ability to obtain physiologic and functional information within reasonably short acquisition times with 3.0-T abdominal MR imaging bodes well for the future of this imaging technique. (C) RSNA, 2009 . radiographics.rsna.org
引用
收藏
页码:1547 / 1564
页数:18
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   Abdominal MR Imaging at 3.0 T [J].
Akisik, Fatih M. ;
Sandrasegaran, Kumaresan ;
Aisen, Alex M. ;
Lin, Chen ;
Lall, Chandana .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2007, 27 (05) :1433-1444
[2]   Spiral volume coil for improved RF field homogeneity at high static magnetic field strength [J].
Alsop, DC ;
Connick, TJ ;
Mizsei, G .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1998, 40 (01) :49-54
[3]   Body MR Imaging at 3.0 T: Understanding the opportunities and challenges [J].
Barth, Mara M. ;
Smith, Martin P. ;
Pedrosa, Ivan ;
Lenkinski, Robert E. ;
Rofsky, Neil M. .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2007, 27 (05) :1445-1462
[4]  
BOTTOMLEY PA, 1984, MED PHYS, V11, P425, DOI 10.1118/1.595535
[5]  
Boyle Gerard E, 2006, Radiographics, V26, pe24, DOI 10.1148/rg.e24
[6]   Reduced RF power without blurring: Correcting for modulation of refocusing flip angle in FSE sequences [J].
Busse, RF .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2004, 51 (05) :1031-1037
[7]  
Campeau N G, 2001, Top Magn Reson Imaging, V12, P183, DOI 10.1097/00002142-200106000-00005
[8]   Fatty Liver Disease: MR Imaging Techniques for the Detection and Quantification of Liver Steatosis [J].
Cassidy, Fiona Hughes ;
Yokoo, Takeshi ;
Aganovic, Lejla ;
Hanna, Robert F. ;
Bydder, Mark ;
Middleton, Michael S. ;
Hamilton, Gavin ;
Chavez, Alyssa D. ;
Schwimmer, Jeffrey B. ;
Sirlin, Claude B. .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2009, 29 (01) :231-260
[9]   3.0-T MR Imaging of the Abdomen: Comparison with 1.5 T [J].
Chang, Kevin J. ;
Kamel, Ihab R. ;
Macura, Katarzyna J. ;
Bluemke, David A. .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2008, 28 (07) :1983-1998
[10]   Steady-state MR imaging sequences: Physics, classification, and clinical applications [J].
Chavhan, Govind B. ;
Babyn, Paul S. ;
Jankharia, Bhavin G. ;
Cheng, Hai-Ling M. ;
Shroff, Manohar M. .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2008, 28 (04) :1147-1160