Near or far: The effect of spatial distance and vocabulary knowledge on word learning

被引:6
作者
Axelsson, Emma L. [1 ]
Perry, Lynn K. [2 ]
Scott, Emilly J. [3 ]
Horst, Jessica S. [4 ]
机构
[1] Australian Natl Univ, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
[2] Univ Miami, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
[3] Univ Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9YL, Midlothian, Scotland
[4] Univ Sussex, Brighton BN1 9RH, E Sussex, England
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
Word learning; Novel objects; Object location; Spatial distance; Vocabulary; ATTENTIONAL SELECTION; YOUNG-CHILDREN; TIME; LOCATIONS; FAMILIARIZATION; REPRESENTATION; COMPETITION; MECHANISMS; TODDLERS; LOOKING;
D O I
10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.11.006
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The current study investigated the role of spatial distance in word learning. Two-year-old children saw three novel objects named while the objects were either in close proximity to each other or spatially separated. Children were then tested on their retention for the name-object associations. Keeping the objects spatially separated from each other during naming was associated with increased retention for children with larger vocabularies. Children with a lower vocabulary size demonstrated better retention if they saw objects in close proximity to each other during naming. This demonstrates that keeping a clear view of objects during naming improves word learning for children who have already learned many words, but keeping objects within close proximal range is better for children at earlier stages of vocabulary acquisition. The effect of distance is therefore not equal across varying vocabulary sizes. The influences of visual crowding, cognitive load, and vocabulary size on word learning are discussed. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 87
页数:7
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   CHART DEMONSTRATING VARIATIONS IN ACUITY WITH RETINAL POSITION [J].
ANSTIS, SM .
VISION RESEARCH, 1974, 14 (07) :589-592
[2]   Testing a word is not a test of word learning [J].
Axelsson, Emma L. ;
Horst, Jessica S. .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2013, 144 (02) :264-268
[3]   The right thing at the right time: why ostensive naming facilitates word learning [J].
Axelsson, Emma L. ;
Churchley, Kirsten ;
Horst, Jessica S. .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 3
[4]   Attentional interference at small spatial separations [J].
Bahcall, DO ;
Kowler, E .
VISION RESEARCH, 1999, 39 (01) :71-86
[5]  
BaronCohen S, 1997, CHILD DEV, V68, P48
[6]  
Bates E, 1997, LANG COGNITIVE PROC, V12, P507
[7]   Spatio-visual memory of children with specific language impairment: evidence for generalized processing problems [J].
Bavin, EL ;
Wilson, PH ;
Maruff, P ;
Sleeman, F .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE & COMMUNICATION DISORDERS, 2005, 40 (03) :319-332
[8]   Failure to learn from feedback underlies word learning difficulties in toddlers at risk for autism [J].
Bedford, R. ;
Gliga, T. ;
Frame, K. ;
Hudry, K. ;
Chandler, S. ;
Johnson, M. H. ;
Charman, T. .
JOURNAL OF CHILD LANGUAGE, 2013, 40 (01) :29-46
[9]   Predictable locations aid early object name learning [J].
Benitez, Viridiana L. ;
Smith, Linda B. .
COGNITION, 2012, 125 (03) :339-352
[10]   Fast mapping, slow learning: Disambiguation of novel word-object mappings in relation to vocabulary learning at 18, 24, and 30 months [J].
Bion, Ricardo A. H. ;
Borovsky, Arielle ;
Fernald, Anne .
COGNITION, 2013, 126 (01) :39-53