DRUG ABUSING WOMEN IN THE COMMUNITY: THE IMPACT OF DRUG COURT INVOLVEMENT ON RECIDIVISM

被引:26
作者
Shaffer, Deborah Koetzle [1 ]
Hartman, Jennifer L. [2 ]
Listwan, Shelley Johnson [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nevada, Dept Criminal Justice, Las Vegas, NV 89154 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Charlotte, NC 28223 USA
[3] Kent State Univ, Dept Justice Studies, Kent, OH USA
关键词
D O I
10.1177/002204260903900402
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Developing community-based options for drug abusing women is important for a variety of reasons. One option that shows promise is the treatment-oriented drug court. Although drug courts enjoy considerable empirical support, relatively few studies have examined the efficacy of this model for women. The current study uses a quasi-experimental design to compare outcomes between a sample of moderate to high-risk drug court participants (n=91) and probationers (n=80). Over the course of an average two year follow-up period, female drug court participants were found to have significantly lower rates of recidivism than their probation counterparts. The results of an event history analysis confirmed that drug court participants were significantly less likely to recidivate even after controlling for differences in length of follow-up. These findings provide support for the ability of drug court programs to successfully treat drug-involved women.
引用
收藏
页码:803 / 827
页数:25
相关论文
共 92 条
[1]  
Allison P. D., 2014, EVENT HIST SURVIVAL
[2]  
ANDEWS DA, 1995, LSI R LEVEL SERVICE
[3]  
ANDEWS DA, 2006, PSYCHOL CRIMINAL CON
[4]  
ANDREWS DA, 1986, CAN J CRIMINOL, V28, P377
[5]   DOES CORRECTIONAL TREATMENT WORK - A CLINICALLY RELEVANT AND PSYCHOLOGICALLY INFORMED METAANALYSIS [J].
ANDREWS, DA ;
ZINGER, I ;
HOGE, RD ;
BONTA, J ;
GENDREAU, P ;
CULLEN, FT .
CRIMINOLOGY, 1990, 28 (03) :369-404
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2008, DRUG COURT REV
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1999, EARLY DRUG COURTS CA, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781452231976.N7
[8]  
[Anonymous], NCJ PUBLICATION
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2002, OUTCOME EVALUATION O
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2007, CRIM JUSTICE POLICY, DOI DOI 10.1177/0887403406298621