Factors affecting methane production and mitigation in ruminants

被引:160
作者
Shibata, Masaki [1 ]
Terada, Fuminori [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Livestock & Grassland Sci, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
关键词
global warming; methane production; mitigation; rumen manipulation; ruminants; FERMENTATION IN-VITRO; CYCLE ASSESSMENT METHOD; DAIRY-COWS; BEEF-CATTLE; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; METABOLIZABLE ENERGY; MILK PRODUCTION; CARBON-DIOXIDE; HOLSTEIN COWS; COCONUT OIL;
D O I
10.1111/j.1740-0929.2009.00687.x
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Methane (CH(4)) is the second most important greenhouse gas (GHG) and that emitted from enteric fermentation in livestock is the single largest source of emissions in Japan. Many factors influence ruminant CH(4) production, including level of intake, type and quality of feeds and environmental temperature. The objectives of this review are to identify the factors affecting CH(4) production in ruminants, to examine technologies for the mitigation of CH(4) emissions from ruminants, and to identify areas requiring further research. The following equation for CH(4) prediction was formulated using only dry matter intake (DMI) and has been adopted in Japan to estimate emissions from ruminant livestock for the National GHG Inventory Report: Y = -17.766 + 42.793X -0.849X(2), where Y is CH(4) production (L/day) and X is DMI (kg/day). Technologies for the mitigation of CH(4) emissions from ruminants include increasing productivity by improving nutritional management, the manipulation of ruminal fermentation by changing feed composition, the addition of CH(4) inhibitors, and defaunation. Considering the importance of ruminant livestock, it is essential to establish economically feasible ways of reducing ruminant CH(4) production while improving productivity; it is therefore critical to conduct a full system analysis to select the best combination of approaches or new technologies to be applied under long-term field conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:2 / 10
页数:9
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]  
*AGR FOR FISH RES, 1987, JAP FEED STAND BEEF
[2]  
*AGR FOR FISH RES, 1987, JAP FEED STAND DAIR
[3]   Methane emission by goats consuming diets with different levels of condensed tannins from lespedeza [J].
Animut, G. ;
Puchala, R. ;
Goetsch, A. L. ;
Patra, A. K. ;
Sahlu, T. ;
Varel, V. H. ;
Wells, J. .
ANIMAL FEED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 144 (3-4) :212-227
[4]   Effect of the addition of fumarate on methane production by ruminal microorganisms in vitro [J].
Asanuma, N ;
Iwamoto, M ;
Hino, T .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 1999, 82 (04) :780-787
[5]  
ASANUMA N, 2004, NIHON CHIKUSAN GAKKA, V75, P543
[6]   BOVINE SOMATOTROPIN - REVIEW OF AN EMERGING ANIMAL TECHNOLOGY [J].
BAUMAN, DE .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 1992, 75 (12) :3432-3451
[7]  
Beauchemin KA, 2005, J ANIM SCI, V83, P653
[8]  
Benchaar C, 1998, J ANIM SCI, V76, P617
[9]   PREDICTION OF AMOUNT OF METHANE PRODUCED BY RUMINANTS [J].
BLAXTER, KL ;
CLAPPERTON, JL .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 1965, 19 (04) :511-+
[10]   The estimation of methane production by cattle [J].
Bratzler, JW ;
Forbes, EB .
JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 1940, 19 (06) :611-613