Hybrid-IoT: Hybrid Blockchain Architecture for Internet of Things - PoW Sub-blockchains

被引:60
作者
Sagirlar, Gokhan [1 ]
Carminati, Barbara [1 ]
Ferrari, Elena [1 ]
Sheehan, John D. [2 ]
Ragnoli, Emanuele [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Insubria, Varese, VA, Italy
[2] IBM Res, Dublin, Ireland
来源
IEEE 2018 INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON CYBERMATICS / 2018 IEEE CONFERENCES ON INTERNET OF THINGS, GREEN COMPUTING AND COMMUNICATIONS, CYBER, PHYSICAL AND SOCIAL COMPUTING, SMART DATA, BLOCKCHAIN, COMPUTER AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY | 2018年
关键词
Blockchain; Internet of Things (IoT); architecture; distributed consensus; Proof of Work (PoW);
D O I
10.1109/Cybermatics_2018.2018.00189
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
From its early days the Internet of Things (IoT) has evolved into a decentralized system of cooperating smart objects with the requirement, among others, of achieving distributed consensus. Yet, current IoT platform solutions are centralized cloud based computing infrastructures, manifesting a number of significant disadvantages, such as, among others, high cloud server maintenance costs, weakness for supporting time-critical IoT applications, security and trust issues. Enabling blockchain technology into IoT can help to achieve a proper distributed consensus based IoT system that overcomes those disadvantages. While this is an ideal match, it is still a challenging endeavor. In this paper we take a first step towards that goal by designing Hybrid-IoT, a hybrid blockchain architecture for IoT. In Hybrid-IoT, subgroups of IoT devices form PoW blockchains, referred to as PoW sub-blockchains. Then, the connection among the PoW sub-blockchains employs a BFT inter-connector framework, such as Polkadot or Cosmos. In this paper, we focus on the PoW sub-blockchains formation, guided by a set of guidelines based on a set of dimensions, metrics and bounds. In order to prove the validity of the approach we carry on a performance and security evaluation.
引用
收藏
页码:1007 / 1016
页数:10
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [11] Misbehavior in Bitcoin: A Study of Double-Spending and Accountability
    Karame, Ghassan O.
    Androulaki, Elli
    Roeschlin, Marc
    Gervais, Arthur
    Capkun, Srdjan
    [J]. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION AND SYSTEM SECURITY, 2015, 18 (01) : 1 - 32
  • [12] LEE B, 2016, J SUPERCOMPUT, V73, P1, DOI DOI 10.1007/S11227-015-1595-5
  • [13] Blockchain based Data Integrity Service Framework for IoT data
    Liu, Bin
    Yu, Xiao Liang
    Chen, Shiping
    Xu, Xiwei
    Zhu, Liming
    [J]. 2017 IEEE 24TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WEB SERVICES (ICWS 2017), 2017, : 468 - 475
  • [14] Merkle R. C., 1987, C THEOR APPL CRYPT T, P369, DOI [DOI 10.1007/3-540-48184-2, DOI 10.1007/3-540-48184-2_32]
  • [15] Nakamoto Satoshi., 2008, BITCOIN ORG
  • [16] Natoli C, 2016, 15TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON NETWORK COMPUTING AND APPLICATIONS (IEEE NCA 2016), P310, DOI 10.1109/NCA.2016.7778635
  • [17] On the features and challenges of security and privacy in distributed internet of things
    Roman, Rodrigo
    Zhou, Jianying
    Lopez, Javier
    [J]. COMPUTER NETWORKS, 2013, 57 (10) : 2266 - 2279
  • [18] Sagirlar G., 2018, ARXIV E PRINTS
  • [19] Bitcoin and Beyond: A Technical Survey on Decentralized Digital Currencies
    Tschorsch, Florian
    Scheuermann, Bjoern
    [J]. IEEE COMMUNICATIONS SURVEYS AND TUTORIALS, 2016, 18 (03): : 2084 - 2123
  • [20] Wu J., 2008, IEEE T CONSUMER ELEC, V54