Hybrid-IoT: Hybrid Blockchain Architecture for Internet of Things - PoW Sub-blockchains

被引:60
作者
Sagirlar, Gokhan [1 ]
Carminati, Barbara [1 ]
Ferrari, Elena [1 ]
Sheehan, John D. [2 ]
Ragnoli, Emanuele [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Insubria, Varese, VA, Italy
[2] IBM Res, Dublin, Ireland
来源
IEEE 2018 INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON CYBERMATICS / 2018 IEEE CONFERENCES ON INTERNET OF THINGS, GREEN COMPUTING AND COMMUNICATIONS, CYBER, PHYSICAL AND SOCIAL COMPUTING, SMART DATA, BLOCKCHAIN, COMPUTER AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY | 2018年
关键词
Blockchain; Internet of Things (IoT); architecture; distributed consensus; Proof of Work (PoW);
D O I
10.1109/Cybermatics_2018.2018.00189
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
From its early days the Internet of Things (IoT) has evolved into a decentralized system of cooperating smart objects with the requirement, among others, of achieving distributed consensus. Yet, current IoT platform solutions are centralized cloud based computing infrastructures, manifesting a number of significant disadvantages, such as, among others, high cloud server maintenance costs, weakness for supporting time-critical IoT applications, security and trust issues. Enabling blockchain technology into IoT can help to achieve a proper distributed consensus based IoT system that overcomes those disadvantages. While this is an ideal match, it is still a challenging endeavor. In this paper we take a first step towards that goal by designing Hybrid-IoT, a hybrid blockchain architecture for IoT. In Hybrid-IoT, subgroups of IoT devices form PoW blockchains, referred to as PoW sub-blockchains. Then, the connection among the PoW sub-blockchains employs a BFT inter-connector framework, such as Polkadot or Cosmos. In this paper, we focus on the PoW sub-blockchains formation, guided by a set of guidelines based on a set of dimensions, metrics and bounds. In order to prove the validity of the approach we carry on a performance and security evaluation.
引用
收藏
页码:1007 / 1016
页数:10
相关论文
共 22 条
[11]   Misbehavior in Bitcoin: A Study of Double-Spending and Accountability [J].
Karame, Ghassan O. ;
Androulaki, Elli ;
Roeschlin, Marc ;
Gervais, Arthur ;
Capkun, Srdjan .
ACM TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION AND SYSTEM SECURITY, 2015, 18 (01) :1-32
[12]  
LEE B, 2016, J SUPERCOMPUT, V73, P1, DOI DOI 10.1007/S11227-015-1595-5
[13]   Blockchain based Data Integrity Service Framework for IoT data [J].
Liu, Bin ;
Yu, Xiao Liang ;
Chen, Shiping ;
Xu, Xiwei ;
Zhu, Liming .
2017 IEEE 24TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WEB SERVICES (ICWS 2017), 2017, :468-475
[14]  
Merkle R. C., 1987, C THEOR APPL CRYPT T, P369, DOI [DOI 10.1007/3-540-48184-2, DOI 10.1007/3-540-48184-2_32]
[15]  
Nakamoto Satoshi., 2008, BITCOIN ORG
[16]  
Natoli C, 2016, 15TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON NETWORK COMPUTING AND APPLICATIONS (IEEE NCA 2016), P310, DOI 10.1109/NCA.2016.7778635
[17]   On the features and challenges of security and privacy in distributed internet of things [J].
Roman, Rodrigo ;
Zhou, Jianying ;
Lopez, Javier .
COMPUTER NETWORKS, 2013, 57 (10) :2266-2279
[18]  
Sagirlar G., 2018, ARXIV E PRINTS
[19]   Bitcoin and Beyond: A Technical Survey on Decentralized Digital Currencies [J].
Tschorsch, Florian ;
Scheuermann, Bjoern .
IEEE COMMUNICATIONS SURVEYS AND TUTORIALS, 2016, 18 (03) :2084-2123
[20]  
Wu J., 2008, IEEE T CONSUMER ELEC, V54