Hybrid-IoT: Hybrid Blockchain Architecture for Internet of Things - PoW Sub-blockchains

被引:60
作者
Sagirlar, Gokhan [1 ]
Carminati, Barbara [1 ]
Ferrari, Elena [1 ]
Sheehan, John D. [2 ]
Ragnoli, Emanuele [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Insubria, Varese, VA, Italy
[2] IBM Res, Dublin, Ireland
来源
IEEE 2018 INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON CYBERMATICS / 2018 IEEE CONFERENCES ON INTERNET OF THINGS, GREEN COMPUTING AND COMMUNICATIONS, CYBER, PHYSICAL AND SOCIAL COMPUTING, SMART DATA, BLOCKCHAIN, COMPUTER AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY | 2018年
关键词
Blockchain; Internet of Things (IoT); architecture; distributed consensus; Proof of Work (PoW);
D O I
10.1109/Cybermatics_2018.2018.00189
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
From its early days the Internet of Things (IoT) has evolved into a decentralized system of cooperating smart objects with the requirement, among others, of achieving distributed consensus. Yet, current IoT platform solutions are centralized cloud based computing infrastructures, manifesting a number of significant disadvantages, such as, among others, high cloud server maintenance costs, weakness for supporting time-critical IoT applications, security and trust issues. Enabling blockchain technology into IoT can help to achieve a proper distributed consensus based IoT system that overcomes those disadvantages. While this is an ideal match, it is still a challenging endeavor. In this paper we take a first step towards that goal by designing Hybrid-IoT, a hybrid blockchain architecture for IoT. In Hybrid-IoT, subgroups of IoT devices form PoW blockchains, referred to as PoW sub-blockchains. Then, the connection among the PoW sub-blockchains employs a BFT inter-connector framework, such as Polkadot or Cosmos. In this paper, we focus on the PoW sub-blockchains formation, guided by a set of guidelines based on a set of dimensions, metrics and bounds. In order to prove the validity of the approach we carry on a performance and security evaluation.
引用
收藏
页码:1007 / 1016
页数:10
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Alphand O, 2018, IEEE WCNC
  • [2] [Anonymous], Discovering Bitcoin's Public Topology and Influential Nodes
  • [3] Bahga A., 2016, J. Softw. Eng. Appl, V09, P533, DOI [10.4236/jsea.2016.910036, DOI 10.4236/JSEA.2016.910036]
  • [4] Buchman E., 2016, Ph.D. dissertation
  • [5] Enhancing user control on personal data usage in Internet of Things ecosystems
    Carminati, Barbara
    Colombo, Pietro
    Ferrari, Elena
    Sagirlar, Gokhan
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS 2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SERVICES COMPUTING (SCC 2016), 2016, : 291 - 298
  • [6] On Scaling Decentralized Blockchains (A Position Paper)
    Croman, Kyle
    Decker, Christian
    Eyal, Ittay
    Gencer, Adem Efe
    Juels, Ari
    Kosba, Ahmed
    Miller, Andrew
    Saxena, Prateek
    Shi, Elaine
    Sirer, Emin Gun
    Song, Dawn
    Wattenhofer, Roger
    [J]. FINANCIAL CRYPTOGRAPHY AND DATA SECURITY, FC 2016, 2016, 9604 : 106 - 125
  • [7] Dorri Ali, 2017, ARXIV171202969
  • [8] Introduction. Claim the right to the city in the American metropolis
    Gervais, Laurence
    Diamond, Andrew
    [J]. REVUE FRANCAISE D ETUDES AMERICAINES, 2016, (148): : 3 - 7
  • [9] World of Empowered IoT Users
    Hashemi, Sayed Hadi
    Faghri, Faraz
    Rausch, Paul
    Campbell, Roy H.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS 2016 IEEE FIRST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTERNET-OF-THINGS DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION IOTDI 2016, 2016, : 13 - 24
  • [10] Huh S, 2017, INT CONF ADV COMMUN, P464, DOI 10.23919/ICACT.2017.7890132