Hybrid-IoT: Hybrid Blockchain Architecture for Internet of Things - PoW Sub-blockchains

被引:61
作者
Sagirlar, Gokhan [1 ]
Carminati, Barbara [1 ]
Ferrari, Elena [1 ]
Sheehan, John D. [2 ]
Ragnoli, Emanuele [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Insubria, Varese, VA, Italy
[2] IBM Res, Dublin, Ireland
来源
IEEE 2018 INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON CYBERMATICS / 2018 IEEE CONFERENCES ON INTERNET OF THINGS, GREEN COMPUTING AND COMMUNICATIONS, CYBER, PHYSICAL AND SOCIAL COMPUTING, SMART DATA, BLOCKCHAIN, COMPUTER AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY | 2018年
关键词
Blockchain; Internet of Things (IoT); architecture; distributed consensus; Proof of Work (PoW);
D O I
10.1109/Cybermatics_2018.2018.00189
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
From its early days the Internet of Things (IoT) has evolved into a decentralized system of cooperating smart objects with the requirement, among others, of achieving distributed consensus. Yet, current IoT platform solutions are centralized cloud based computing infrastructures, manifesting a number of significant disadvantages, such as, among others, high cloud server maintenance costs, weakness for supporting time-critical IoT applications, security and trust issues. Enabling blockchain technology into IoT can help to achieve a proper distributed consensus based IoT system that overcomes those disadvantages. While this is an ideal match, it is still a challenging endeavor. In this paper we take a first step towards that goal by designing Hybrid-IoT, a hybrid blockchain architecture for IoT. In Hybrid-IoT, subgroups of IoT devices form PoW blockchains, referred to as PoW sub-blockchains. Then, the connection among the PoW sub-blockchains employs a BFT inter-connector framework, such as Polkadot or Cosmos. In this paper, we focus on the PoW sub-blockchains formation, guided by a set of guidelines based on a set of dimensions, metrics and bounds. In order to prove the validity of the approach we carry on a performance and security evaluation.
引用
收藏
页码:1007 / 1016
页数:10
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Alphand O, 2018, IEEE WCNC
[2]  
[Anonymous], Discovering Bitcoin's Public Topology and Influential Nodes
[3]  
Bahga A., 2016, J. Softw. Eng. Appl, V09, P533, DOI [10.4236/jsea.2016.910036, DOI 10.4236/JSEA.2016.910036]
[4]  
Buchman E., 2016, Ph.D. dissertation
[5]   Enhancing user control on personal data usage in Internet of Things ecosystems [J].
Carminati, Barbara ;
Colombo, Pietro ;
Ferrari, Elena ;
Sagirlar, Gokhan .
PROCEEDINGS 2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SERVICES COMPUTING (SCC 2016), 2016, :291-298
[6]   On Scaling Decentralized Blockchains (A Position Paper) [J].
Croman, Kyle ;
Decker, Christian ;
Eyal, Ittay ;
Gencer, Adem Efe ;
Juels, Ari ;
Kosba, Ahmed ;
Miller, Andrew ;
Saxena, Prateek ;
Shi, Elaine ;
Sirer, Emin Gun ;
Song, Dawn ;
Wattenhofer, Roger .
FINANCIAL CRYPTOGRAPHY AND DATA SECURITY, FC 2016, 2016, 9604 :106-125
[7]  
Dorri Ali, 2017, ARXIV171202969
[8]   Introduction. Claim the right to the city in the American metropolis [J].
Gervais, Laurence ;
Diamond, Andrew .
REVUE FRANCAISE D ETUDES AMERICAINES, 2016, (148) :3-7
[9]   World of Empowered IoT Users [J].
Hashemi, Sayed Hadi ;
Faghri, Faraz ;
Rausch, Paul ;
Campbell, Roy H. .
PROCEEDINGS 2016 IEEE FIRST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTERNET-OF-THINGS DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION IOTDI 2016, 2016, :13-24
[10]  
Huh S, 2017, INT CONF ADV COMMUN, P464, DOI 10.23919/ICACT.2017.7890132