Avanca Brasil: Environmental and social consequences of Brazil's planned infrastructure in Amazonia

被引:74
作者
Fearnside, PM [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Res Amazon, INPA, Dept Ecol, BR-69011970 Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil
关键词
Amazonia; Brazil; deforestation; environmental impact assessment; highways;
D O I
10.1007/s00267-002-2788-2
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Avanpa Brasil (Forward Brazil) is a package of 338 projects throughout Brazil; the portion of the plan to be carried out in Brazil's Legal Amazon region totals US$43 billion over 8 years, US$20 billion of which would be for infrastructure causing environmental damage. Brazil's environmental impact assessment system is not yet capable of coping with the challenge presented by Avanpa Brasil. Generic problems with the licensing process include stimulation of a lobby in favor of construction before decisions are made on the advisability of the projects, the "dragging effect" of third parties, whereby economic activity is attracted to the infrastructure but escapes the environmental impact assessment system, a tendency for consulting firms to produce favorable reports, a bureaucratic emphasis on the existence of steps without regard to the content of what is said, and the inability to take account of the chain of events unleashed when a given project is undertaken. The environmental and social costs of forest loss are high; among them is loss of opportunities for sustainable use of the forest, including loss of environmental services such as biodiversity maintenance, water cycling, and carbon storage. The benefits of export infrastructure are meager, especially from the point of view of generating employment. Much of the transportation infrastructure is for soybeans, while the hydroelectric dams contribute to processing aluminum. The example of Avanpa Brasil makes clear the need to rethink how major development decisions are made and to reconsider a number of the plan's component projects.
引用
收藏
页码:735 / 747
页数:13
相关论文
共 49 条
[11]  
*CONS BRAS, 2000, PBACN0197
[12]  
COTTON C, 1999, FACING DESTRUCTION G
[13]   How well does Brazil's environmental law work in practice? Environmental impact assessment and the case of the Itapiranga Private Sustainable Logging Plan [J].
Eve, E ;
Arguelles, FA ;
Fearnside, PM .
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2000, 26 (03) :251-267
[14]  
Fearnside P M., 2001, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, V6, P355, DOI DOI 10.1023/A:1013379103245
[15]   Forests and global warming mitigation in Brazil: opportunities in the Brazilian forest sector for responses to global warming under the "clean development mechanism" [J].
Fearnside, PM .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 1999, 16 (03) :171-189
[16]   Biodiversity as an environmental service in Brazil's Amazonian forests: risks, value and conservation [J].
Fearnside, PM .
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, 1999, 26 (04) :305-321
[17]   Environmental services as a strategy for sustainable development in rural Amazonia [J].
Fearnside, PM .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1997, 20 (01) :53-70
[18]   Land-tenure issues as factors in environmental destruction in Brazilian Amazonia: The case of Southern Para [J].
Fearnside, PM .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2001, 29 (08) :1361-1372
[19]   Social impacts of Brazil's Tucurui Dam [J].
Fearnside, PM .
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1999, 24 (04) :483-495
[20]   Soybean cultivation as a threat to the environment in Brazil [J].
Fearnside, PM .
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, 2001, 28 (01) :23-38