Using Design-science for the Representation of Non Functional Requirements

被引:0
作者
Buitron, Sandra L. [1 ]
Pino, Francisco J. [1 ]
Curieux, Tulio Rojas [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cauca, Grp Invest IIDIS, Fac Ingn Elect & Telecomunicac, Popayan, Colombia
[2] Univ Cauca, Grp Invest GELPS, Fac Ciencias Humanas & Sociales, Popayan, Colombia
来源
2020 15TH IBERIAN CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES (CISTI'2020) | 2020年
关键词
requirements engineering; requirements elicitation; representation of non functional requirements; semiotics theory; design-science; ALIGNMENT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Context: In software development, non-functional requirements (NFRs) determine a large part of the quality of software products. Despite this, the Software Industry does not yet have a clear outlook of how to elicit this type of requirements from the early stages of development. Proposal: Given this problem, the MERliNN Framework was created to support this process of elicitation of NFRs based in knowledge management, which is evolving through the construction of a component for the iconographic representation of NFRs, called NFR-REP. Objective: To present the progress in the construction of the NFR-REP component to represent the NFRs. Method: The Design-science methodology is used to construct the representation component, and semantic analysis to determine the structure and constituent elements of the component. Results: Two elements of the component are defined: (1) the aspects of the NFRs identified from the literature, (2) the strategy to represent the NFRs supported by the theory of semiotics and signs. Conclusions: (1) the methods used for the construction of the component NFR-REP are adequate to guide such construction, (2) the theory of semiotics gives capacity to the component of NFRs representation of address the knowledge problem against NFRs.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2011, ISO/IEC 25010
[2]   Linguistic alignment between people and computers [J].
Branigan, Holly P. ;
Pickering, Martin J. ;
Pearson, Jamie ;
McLean, Janet F. .
JOURNAL OF PRAGMATICS, 2010, 42 (09) :2355-2368
[3]   Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation [J].
Brennan, SE ;
Clark, HH .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1996, 22 (06) :1482-1493
[4]  
Buitrón Sandra L., 2018, Ingeniare. Rev. chil. ing., V26, P142
[5]   Getting to the shalls: Facilitating Sensemaking in Requirements Engineering [J].
Chakraborty, Suranjan ;
Rosenkranz, Christoph ;
Dehlinger, Josh .
ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems, 2015, 5 (03)
[6]   The emergence of shared understanding: applying functional pragmatics to study the requirements development process [J].
Charaf, Marianne Corvera ;
Rosenkranz, Christoph ;
Holten, Roland .
INFORMATION SYSTEMS JOURNAL, 2013, 23 (02) :115-135
[7]   A framework for integrating non-functional requirements into conceptual models [J].
Cysneiros L.M. ;
Leite J.C.S.D.P. ;
Neto J.D.M.S. .
Requirements Engineering, 2001, 6 (2) :97-115
[8]  
Farid W., 2012, P SECON, P1
[9]  
Fernandez D.M., 2017, ARXIV171004630
[10]   Putting non-functional requirements into software architecture [J].
Franch, X ;
Botella, P .
NINTH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON SOFTWARE SPECIFICATION AND DESIGN, PROCEEDINGS, 1998, :60-67