Sensitivity of goodness-of-fit statistics to rainfall data rounding off

被引:37
作者
Deidda, Roberto [1 ]
Puliga, Michelangelo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cagliari, Dipartimento Ingn Terr, I-09123 Cagliari, Italy
关键词
daily rainfall data analysis; generalized Pareto distribution; L-moments; goodness of fit statistics; rounding off sample values;
D O I
10.1016/j.pce.2006.04.041
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
An analysis based on the L-moments theory suggests of adopting the generalized Pareto distribution to interpret daily rainfall depths recorded by the rain-gauge network of the Hydrological Survey of the Sardinia Region. Nevertheless, a big problem, not yet completely resolved, arises in the estimation of a left-censoring threshold able to assure a good fitting of rainfall data with the generalized Pareto distribution. In order to detect an optimal threshold, keeping the largest possible number of data, we chose to apply a "failure-to-reject" method based on goodness-of-fit tests, as it was proposed by Choulakian and Stephens [Choulakian, V., Stephens, M.A., 2001. Goodness-of-fit tests for the generalized Pareto distribution. Technometrics 43, 478-484]. Unfortunately, the application of the test, using percentage points provided by Choulakian and Stephens (2001), did not succeed in detecting a useful threshold value in most analyzed time series. A deeper analysis revealed that these failures are mainly due to the presence of large quantities of rounding off values among sample data, affecting the distribution of goodness-of-fit statistics and leading to significant departures from percentage points expected for continuous random variables. A procedure based on Monte Carlo simulations is thus proposed to overcome these problems. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1240 / 1251
页数:12
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   ASSESSMENT OF FLOOD FREQUENCY MODELS USING EMPIRICAL DISTRIBUTION FUNCTION STATISTICS [J].
AHMAD, MI ;
SINCLAIR, CD ;
SPURR, BD .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1988, 24 (08) :1323-1328
[2]   An evaluation of three stochastic rainfall models [J].
Cameron, D ;
Beven, K ;
Tawn, J .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2000, 228 (1-2) :130-149
[3]   Flood frequency estimation by continuous simulation for a gauged upland catchment (with uncertainty) [J].
Cameron, DS ;
Beven, KJ ;
Tawn, J ;
Blazkova, S ;
Naden, P .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1999, 219 (3-4) :169-187
[4]   Goodness-of-fit tests for the generalized Pareto distribution [J].
Choulakian, V ;
Stephens, MA .
TECHNOMETRICS, 2001, 43 (04) :478-484
[5]   Can continuous streamflow data support flood frequency analysis? An alternative to the partial duration series approach [J].
Claps, P ;
Laio, F .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2003, 39 (08) :SWC61-SWC611
[6]   A fully probabilistic approach to extreme rainfall modeling [J].
Coles, S ;
Pericchi, LR ;
Sisson, S .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2003, 273 (1-4) :35-50
[7]  
COLES S, 2001, INTRO STATISTICAL MO
[8]  
DAVISON AC, 1990, J ROY STAT SOC B MET, V52, P393
[9]   Some hydrological applications of small sample estimators of Generalized Pareto and Extreme Value distributions [J].
De Michele, C ;
Salvadori, G .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2005, 301 (1-4) :37-53
[10]   Limiting forms of the frequency distribution of the largest or smallest member of a sample [J].
Fisher, RA ;
Tippett, LHC .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE CAMBRIDGE PHILOSOPHICAL SOCIETY, 1928, 24 :180-190