Electrocardiographic Criteria for the Diagnosis of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy

被引:143
作者
Peguero, Julio G. [1 ]
Lo Presti, Saberio [2 ]
Perez, Jorge [2 ]
Issa, Omar [1 ]
Brenes, Juan C. [1 ]
Tolentino, Alfonso [1 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Div Cardiol, New York, NY 10027 USA
[2] Mt Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Med, Miami Beach, FL 33140 USA
关键词
electrocardiogram; left ventricular hypertrophy; novel criteria; RECOMMENDATIONS; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; ASSOCIATION; VALIDATION; SOCIETY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jacc.2017.01.037
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Current electrocardiographic (ECG) criteria for the diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) have low sensitivity. OBJECTIVES The goal of this study was to test a new method to improve the diagnostic performance of the electrocardiogram. METHODS The study was divided into 2 groups, a test and a validation cohort. In the test cohort, 94 patients were analyzed, including 47 with the diagnosis of hypertensive crisis and 47 with normal blood pressure at admission. Echocardiography was used to estimate the left ventricular mass index. Area under the curve (AUC) analysis was used for comparison of single and combined leads. The McNemar test was used to assess agreement among the ECG criteria against the left ventricular mass index. The proposed ECG criteria involved measuring the amplitude of the deepest S wave (SD) in any single lead and adding it to the S wave amplitude of lead V-4 (SV4). Currently accepted LVH ECG criteria such as Cornell voltage and Sokolow-Lyon were used for comparison. The validation cohort consisted of 122 consecutive patients referred for an echocardiogram regardless of the admitting diagnosis. RESULTS The SD was the most accurate single lead measurement for the diagnosis of LVH (AUC: 0.80; p < 0.001). When both cohorts were analyzed, the SD + SV4 criteria outperformed Cornell voltage with a significantly higher sensitivity (62% [95% confidence interval [CI]: 50% to 72%] vs. 35% [95% CI: 24% to 46%]). The specificities of all the criteria were $ 90%, with no significant difference among them. CONCLUSIONS The proposed criteria for theECGdiagnosis ofLVHimproved the sensitivity and overall accuracy of the test. (C) 2017 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
引用
收藏
页码:1694 / 1703
页数:10
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Day-to-day variability of electrocardiographic diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensive patients. Influence of electrode placement [J].
Angeli, Fabio ;
Verdecchia, Paolo ;
Angeli, Enrica ;
Poeta, Fabrizio ;
Sardone, Mariagrazia ;
Bentivoglio, Maurizio ;
Prosciutti, Lucio ;
Cocchieri, Maurizio ;
Zollino, Liliana ;
Bellomo, Gianni ;
Rondoni, Francesco ;
Garognoli, Oriana ;
Lenti, Salvatore ;
Frigerio, Carlo ;
Gattobigio, Roberto ;
Benemio, Guglielmo ;
Biscottini, Bruno ;
Panciarola, Rosita ;
Buccolieri, Massimo ;
Liberati, Rita ;
Trottini, Mario ;
Cipollini, Franco ;
Gemelli, Fabio ;
Schillaci, Giuseppe ;
Porcellati, Carlo .
JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2006, 7 (11) :812-816
[2]   Left Ventricular Hypertrophy: The Relationship between the Electrocardiogram and Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging [J].
Bacharova, Ljuba ;
Ugander, Martin .
ANNALS OF NONINVASIVE ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, 2014, 19 (06) :524-533
[3]   Electrocardiography-left ventricular mass discrepancies in left ventricular hypertrophy: electrocardiography imperfection or beyond perfection? [J].
Bacharova, Ljuba .
JOURNAL OF ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, 2009, 42 (06) :593-596
[4]   IMPROVED SEX-SPECIFIC CRITERIA OF LEFT-VENTRICULAR HYPERTROPHY FOR CLINICAL AND COMPUTER INTERPRETATION OF ELECTROCARDIOGRAMS - VALIDATION WITH AUTOPSY FINDINGS [J].
CASALE, PN ;
DEVEREUX, RB ;
ALONSO, DR ;
CAMPO, E ;
KLIGFIELD, P .
CIRCULATION, 1987, 75 (03) :565-572
[5]   ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHIC DETECTION OF LEFT-VENTRICULAR HYPERTROPHY - DEVELOPMENT AND PROSPECTIVE VALIDATION OF IMPROVED CRITERIA [J].
CASALE, PN ;
DEVEREUX, RB ;
KLIGFIELD, P ;
EISENBERG, RR ;
MILLER, DH ;
CHAUDHARY, BS ;
PHILLIPS, MC .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1985, 6 (03) :572-580
[6]   Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure [J].
Chobanian, AV ;
Bakris, GL ;
Black, HR ;
Cushman, WC ;
Green, LA ;
Izzo, JL ;
Jones, DW ;
Materson, BJ ;
Oparil, S ;
Wright, JT ;
Roccella, EJ .
HYPERTENSION, 2003, 42 (06) :1206-1252
[7]   Statistical evaluation of prognostic versus diagnostic models: Beyond the ROC curve [J].
Cook, Nancy R. .
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2008, 54 (01) :17-23
[8]   Assessing the Incremental Role of Novel and Emerging Risk Factors [J].
Cook N.R. .
Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports, 2010, 4 (2) :112-119
[9]   TOTAL EXCITATION OF ISOLATED HUMAN HEART [J].
DURRER, D ;
VANDAM, RT ;
FREUD, GE ;
JANSE, MJ ;
MEIJLER, FL ;
ARZBAECHER, RC .
CIRCULATION, 1970, 41 (06) :899-+
[10]   AHA/ACCF/HRS Recommendations for the Standardization and Interpretation of the Electrocardiogram Part V: Electrocardiogram Changes Associated With Cardiac Chamber Hypertrophy A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society Endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology [J].
Hancock, E. William ;
Deal, Barbara J. ;
Mirvis, David M. ;
Okin, Peter ;
Kligfield, Paul ;
Gettes, Leonard S. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2009, 53 (11) :992-1002