机构:
Sam Houston State Univ, Dept Psychol & Philosophy, 1901 Ave 1,Suite 390, Huntsville, TX 77340 USAUniv Cambridge, Inst Criminol, Cambridge, England
Kavish, Nicholas
[2
]
Katz, Ian M.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
St Louis Univ, Dept Psychol, 221 N Grand Blvd, St Louis, MO 63103 USAUniv Cambridge, Inst Criminol, Cambridge, England
Katz, Ian M.
[3
]
Boutwell, Brian B.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
St Louis Univ, Sch Med, Coll Publ Hlth & Social Justice,Family & Communit, Criminol & Criminal Justice,Dept Epidemiol & Bios, St Louis, MO USAUniv Cambridge, Inst Criminol, Cambridge, England
Boutwell, Brian B.
[4
]
机构:
[1] Univ Cambridge, Inst Criminol, Cambridge, England
[2] Sam Houston State Univ, Dept Psychol & Philosophy, 1901 Ave 1,Suite 390, Huntsville, TX 77340 USA
[3] St Louis Univ, Dept Psychol, 221 N Grand Blvd, St Louis, MO 63103 USA
[4] St Louis Univ, Sch Med, Coll Publ Hlth & Social Justice,Family & Communit, Criminol & Criminal Justice,Dept Epidemiol & Bios, St Louis, MO USA
Substantial research has investigated the association between intelligence and psychopathic traits. The findings to date have been inconsistent and have not always considered the multidimensional nature of psychopathic traits. Moreover, there has been a tendency to confuse psychopathy with other closely related, clinically significant disorders. The current study represents a meta-analysis conducted to evaluate the direction and magnitude of the association of intelligence with global psychopathy, as well as its factors and facets, and related disorders (i.e. antisocial personality disorder, conduct disorder, and oppositional defiant disorder). Our analyses revealed a small, significant, negative relationship between intelligence and total psychopathy (r = -.07, p = .001). Analysis of factors and facets found differential associations, including both significant positive (e.g. interpersonal facet) and negative (e.g. affective facet) associations, further affirming that psychopathy is a multidimensional construct. Additionally, intelligence was negatively associated with antisocial personality disorder (r = -.13, p = .001) and conduct disorder (r = -.11, p = .001) but positively with oppositional defiant disorder (r = .06, p = .001). There was significant heterogeneity across studies for most effects, but the results of moderator analyses were inconsistent. Finally, bias analyses did not find significant evidence for publication bias or outsized effects of outliers. (c) 2019 European Association of Personality Psychology