Passive treatment of acid mine drainage in bioreactors using sulfate-reducing bacteria:: Critical review and research needs

被引:408
作者
Neculita, Carmen-Mihaela
Zagury, Gerald J. [1 ]
Bussiere, Bruno
机构
[1] Ecole Polytech, Dept Civil Geol & Min Engn, Montreal, PQ H3C 3A7, Canada
[2] Univ Quebec Abitibi Temiscamingue, Dept Appl Sci, Rouyn Noranda, PQ J9X 5E4, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.2134/jeq2006.0066
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Acid mine drainage (AMD), characterized by low pH and high concentrations of sulfate and heavy metals, is an important and widespread environmental problem related to the mining industry. Sulfate-reducing passive bioreactors have received much attention lately as promising biotechnologies for AMD treatment. They offer advantages such as high metal removal at low pH, stable sludge, very low operation costs, and minimal energy consumption. Sulfide precipitation is the desired mechanism of contaminant removal; however, many mechanisms including adsorption and precipitation of metal carbonates and hydroxides occur in passive bioreactors. The efficiency of sulfate-reducing passive bioreactors is sometimes limited because they rely on the activity of an anaerobic microflora [including sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB)] which is controlled primarily by the reactive mixture composition. The most important mixture component is the organic carbon source. The performance of field bioreactors can also be limited by AMD load and metal toxicity. Several studies conducted to find the best mixture of natural organic substrates for SRB are reviewed. Moreover, critical parameters for design and long-term operation are discussed. Additional work needs to be done to properly assess the long-term efficiency of reactive mixtures and the metal removal mechanisms. Furthermore, metal speciation and ecotoxicological assessment of treated effluent from on-site passive bioreactors have yet to be performed.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 16
页数:16
相关论文
共 131 条
[1]  
ALANI WAG, 1994, THESIS U TORONTO TOR
[2]   Substrate characterisation for a subsurface reactive barrier to treat colliery spoil leachate [J].
Amos, PW ;
Younger, PL .
WATER RESEARCH, 2003, 37 (01) :108-120
[3]   Reactive transport modeling of column experiments for the remediation of acid mine drainage [J].
Amos, RT ;
Mayer, KU ;
Blowes, DW ;
Ptacek, CJ .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 38 (11) :3131-3138
[4]  
[Anonymous], MET MIN GUID DOC AQ
[5]  
Aubertin M., 2001, GEOTECH NEWS, V19, P21
[6]  
Beaulieu S, 1999, PHYTOREMEDIATION AND INNOVATIVE STRATEGIES FOR SPECIALIZED REMEDIAL APPLICATIONS, P211
[7]  
Beaulieu S, 2000, ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES AND MANAGEMENT OF WASTE IN ENERGY AND MINERAL PRODUCTION, P533
[8]   USE OF CELLULOSIC SUBSTRATES FOR THE MICROBIAL TREATMENT OF ACID-MINE DRAINAGE [J].
BECHARD, G ;
YAMAZAKI, H ;
GOULD, WD ;
BEDARD, P .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 1994, 23 (01) :111-116
[9]   Rates of sulfate reduction and metal sulfide precipitation in a permeable reactive barrier [J].
Benner, SG ;
Blowes, DW ;
Ptacek, CJ ;
Mayer, KU .
APPLIED GEOCHEMISTRY, 2002, 17 (03) :301-320
[10]   Modeling preferential flow in reactive barriers: Implications for performance and design [J].
Benner, SG ;
Blowes, DW ;
Molson, JWH .
GROUND WATER, 2001, 39 (03) :371-379