The development of skin conductance fear conditioning in children from ages 3 to 8 years

被引:42
作者
Gao, Yu [1 ,2 ]
Raine, Adrian [1 ,2 ]
Venables, Peter H. [3 ]
Dawson, Michael E. [4 ]
Mednick, Sarnoff A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Criminol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Dept Psychiat & Psychol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Univ York, Dept Psychol, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
[4] Univ So Calif, Dept Psychol, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
关键词
INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; HUMAN AMYGDALA; AWARENESS; RESPONSES; BEHAVIOR; GSR; STIMULATION; HABITUATION; ACQUISITION; EXTINCTION;
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00874.x
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
Although fear conditioning is an important psychological construct implicated in behavioral and emotional problems, little is known about how it develops in early childhood. Using a differential, partial reinforcement conditioning paradigm, this longitudinal study assessed skin conductance conditioned responses in 200 children at ages 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8 years. Results demonstrated that in both boys and girls: (1) fear conditioning increased across age, particularly from ages 5 to 6 years, (2) the three components of skin conductance fear conditioning that reflect different degrees of automatic and controlled cognitive processes exhibited different developmental profiles, and (3) individual differences in arousal, orienting, and the unconditioned response were associated with individual differences in conditioning, with the influence of orienting increasing at later ages. This first longitudinal study of the development of skin conductance fear conditioning in children both demonstrates that children as young as age 3 years evidence fear conditioning in a difficult acquisition paradigm, and that different sub-components of skin conductance conditioning have different developmental trajectories.
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 212
页数:12
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1963, Perception and the conditioned reflex
[2]   EFFECTS OF UCS PROBABILITY ON THE CONTINGENT NEGATIVE-VARIATION AND ELECTRODERMAL RESPONSE DURING LONG ISI CONDITIONING [J].
BACKS, RW ;
GRINGS, WW .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1985, 22 (03) :268-275
[3]   Serial pathways from primate prefrontal cortex to autonomic areas may influence emotional expression [J].
Barbas, H ;
Saha, S ;
Rempel-Clower, N ;
Ghashghaei, T .
BMC NEUROSCIENCE, 2003, 4 (1)
[4]   Dorsal hippocampus and classical fear conditioning to tone and context in rats: Effects of local NMDA-receptor blockade and stimulation [J].
Bast, T ;
Zhang, WN ;
Feldon, J .
HIPPOCAMPUS, 2003, 13 (06) :657-675
[5]  
BLOCK JD, 1970, CHILD DEV, V41, P771, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1970.tb01030.x
[6]   A COMPARISON OF GSR FEAR RESPONSES PRODUCED BY THREAT AND ELECTRIC-SHOCK [J].
BRIDGER, WH ;
MANDEL, IJ .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 1964, 2 (01) :31-40
[7]   Classical fear conditioning in functional neuroimaging [J].
Büchel, C ;
Dolan, RJ .
CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROBIOLOGY, 2000, 10 (02) :219-223
[8]   Contingency awareness in human aversive conditioning involves the middle frontal gyrus [J].
Carter, RM ;
O'Doherty, JP ;
Seymour, B ;
Koch, C ;
Dolan, RJ .
NEUROIMAGE, 2006, 29 (03) :1007-1012
[9]   Activity in the human amygdala corresponds to early, rather than late period autonomic responses to a signal for shock [J].
Cheng, Dominic T. ;
Richards, Jennifer ;
Helmstetter, Fred J. .
LEARNING & MEMORY, 2007, 14 (07) :485-490
[10]  
Cohen J., 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, VSecond