Engineering graduates professional formation: the connection between activity types and professional competencies

被引:5
作者
Lowe, David [1 ]
Goldfinch, Tom [1 ]
Kadi, Anthony [1 ]
Willey, Keith [1 ]
Wilkinson, Tim [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Fac Engn, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
Engineering; professional practice; design; reflections;
D O I
10.1080/03043797.2021.1901074
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The professional formation of new graduates and their ability to perform well at the start of their career depends on the development of both technical skills and professional competencies. Whilst the latter aspects have become increasingly considered within engineering programs, they are often learnt within an academic context rather than a practice context. This is in contrast with research that argues that professional expertise should be learnt within the context in which it will be applied. This paper reports on an analysis of engineering student reflections on professional engagement activities over the duration of their university study. A text-based thematic analysis examines the link between different types of activities and professional competencies (using Engineers Australia Stage 1 Competencies), and the level of sophistication in the language using Blooms taxonomy. The thematic analysis provides strong evidence that different activity types result in students being more likely to reflect upon specific competencies. The deeper Bloom analysis showed that generally the activity types that have reflections skewed towards higher Bloom levels are those that involve project activities. We conclude that those activities that require student-driven exploration are the most likely to engage students in thinking about the nature of real-world engineering practice..
引用
收藏
页码:8 / 29
页数:22
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Learning as acquiring a discursive identity through participation in a community: improving student learning in engineering education
    Allie, Saalih
    Armien, Mogamat Noor
    Burgoyne, Nicolette
    Case, Jennifer M.
    Collier-Reed, Brandon I.
    Craig, Tracy S.
    Deacon, Andrew
    Fraser, Duncan M.
    Geyer, Zulpha
    Jacobs, Cecilia
    Jawitz, Jeff
    Kloot, Bruce
    Kotta, Linda
    Langdon, Genevieve
    le Roux, Kate
    Marshall, Delia
    Mogashana, Disaapele
    Shaw, Corrinne
    Sheridana, Gillian
    Wolmarans, Nicolette
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2009, 34 (04) : 359 - 367
  • [2] Anderson Lorin W., 2001, TAXONOMY LEARNING TE
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2011, CRIT ACCR ENG PROGR
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2004, ENG 2020 VIS ENG NEW
  • [5] Bernstein Basil., 1975, CLASS CODES CONTROL
  • [6] Biggs J., 1982, A Handbook for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: Enhancing Academic Practice, DOI [DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-097552-5.50007-7, DOI 10.1177/089202068700100412]
  • [7] Crosthwaite C., 2019, Engineering Futures 2035: A Scoping Study
  • [8] Dehing A., 2013, Engineering Education, V8, P42
  • [9] Dreyfus HL., 1986, MIND MACHINE
  • [10] Engineers Australia, 2018, AMS-MAN-10)