An adaptive bounded-confidence model of opinion dynamics on networks

被引:20
作者
Kan, Unchitta [1 ]
Feng, Michelle [2 ]
Porter, Mason A. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] George Mason Univ, Dept Computat & Data Sci, 4400 Univ Dr, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA
[2] CALTECH, Dept Comp Math Sci, 1200 E Calif Blvd,MC 305-16, Pasadena, CA 91125 USA
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Math, Math Sci Bldg,520 Portola Plaza,Box 951555, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[4] Santa Fe Inst, 1399 Hyde Pk Rd, Santa Fe, NM 87501 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
opinion dynamics; bounded-confidence models; coevolving networks; homophily; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1093/comnet/cnac055
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Individuals who interact with each other in social networks often exchange ideas and influence each other's opinions. A popular approach to study the spread of opinions on networks is by examining bounded-confidence models (BCMs), in which the nodes of a network have continuous-valued states that encode their opinions and are receptive to other nodes' opinions when they lie within some confidence bound of their own opinion. In this article, we extend the Deffuant-Weisbuch (DW) model, which is a well-known BCM, by examining the spread of opinions that coevolve with network structure. We propose an adaptive variant of the DW model in which the nodes of a network can (1) alter their opinions when they interact with neighbouring nodes and (2) break connections with neighbours based on an opinion tolerance threshold and then form new connections following the principle of homophily. This opinion tolerance threshold determines whether or not the opinions of adjacent nodes are sufficiently different to be viewed as 'discordant'. Using numerical simulations, we find that our adaptive DW model requires a larger confidence bound than a baseline DW model for the nodes of a network to achieve a consensus opinion. In one region of parameter space, we observe 'pseudo-consensus' steady states, in which there exist multiple subclusters of an opinion cluster with opinions that differ from each other by a small amount. In our simulations, we also examine the roles of early-time dynamics and nodes with initially moderate opinions for achieving consensus. Additionally, we explore the effects of coevolution on the convergence time of our BCM.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 37 条
[11]   Coevolutionary network approach to cultural dynamics controlled by intolerance [J].
Gracia-Lazaro, Carlos ;
Quijandria, Fernando ;
Hernandez, Laura ;
Mario Floria, Luis ;
Moreno, Yamir .
PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2011, 84 (06)
[12]   Adaptive coevolutionary networks: a review [J].
Gross, Thilo ;
Blasius, Bernd .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY INTERFACE, 2008, 5 (20) :259-271
[13]  
Hegselmann R, 2002, JASSS-J ARTIF SOC S, V5
[14]   A Bounded-Confidence Model of Opinion Dynamics on Hypergraphs [J].
Hickok, Abigail ;
Kureh, Yacoub ;
Brooks, Heather Z. ;
Feng, Michelle ;
Porter, Mason A. .
SIAM JOURNAL ON APPLIED DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS, 2022, 21 (01) :1-32
[15]   ERGODIC THEOREMS FOR WEAKLY INTERACTING INFINITE SYSTEMS AND VOTER MODEL [J].
HOLLEY, RA ;
LIGGETT, TM .
ANNALS OF PROBABILITY, 1975, 3 (04) :643-663
[16]   Nonequilibrium phase transition in the coevolution of networks and opinions [J].
Holme, Petter ;
Newman, M. E. J. .
PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2006, 74 (05)
[17]   The homophily principle in social network analysis: A survey [J].
Khanam, Kazi Zainab ;
Srivastava, Gautam ;
Mago, Vijay .
MULTIMEDIA TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS, 2023, 82 (06) :8811-8854
[18]   Origins of Homophily in an Evolving Social Network [J].
Kossinets, Gueorgi ;
Watts, Duncan J. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 2009, 115 (02) :405-450
[19]   Consensus formation on coevolving networks: groups' formation and structure [J].
Kozma, Balazs ;
Barrat, Alain .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICS A-MATHEMATICAL AND THEORETICAL, 2008, 41 (22)
[20]   Consensus formation on adaptive networks [J].
Kozma, Balazs ;
Barrat, Alain .
PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2008, 77 (01)