Shaping educational accountability systems

被引:7
作者
Ryan, K [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Educ Psychol, Champaign, IL 61820 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1177/109821400202300406
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB) institutionalizes the reliance on accountability and assessment systems as a key mechanism for improving student achievement (Linn, Baker, & Betebenner, 2002). However, there is a fundamental tension between performance measurement systems, which do serve stakeholders and public interests through monitoring, and these kinds of indicators where representations of program quality are oversimplified (Stake, 2001). Evaluators are uniquely situated to made a significant contribution in the dialogue about the merits and shortcomings of educational accountability systems. Suggestions concerning how evaluation can contribute to improving and changing accountability systems are presented.
引用
收藏
页码:453 / 468
页数:16
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], ED RES
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1996, DEMOCRACY DIFFERENCE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2001, EVALUATION-US, DOI DOI 10.1177/135638900100700203
[4]  
[Anonymous], NEW DIRECTIONS EVALU
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2001, EVALUATION-US
[6]  
Baker E. L., 2002, CRESST POLICY BRIEF, V5
[7]  
CARLSON D, 2000, 30 ANN NAT C LARG SC
[8]  
CHUDOWSKY N, 1997, NAT COUNC MEAS ED CH
[9]  
Clotfelter CT, 1996, Holding Schools Accountable: Performance-Based Reform in Education, P23
[10]   The new faces of fairness [J].
Cole, NS ;
Zieky, MJ .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT, 2001, 38 (04) :369-382