Health-related direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a review of companies' policies with regard to genetic testing in minors

被引:41
|
作者
Borry, Pascal [1 ]
Howard, Heidi C. [1 ]
Senecal, Karine [2 ]
Avard, Denise [3 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Ctr Biomed Eth & Law, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[2] Univ Montreal, Ctr Rech Droit Publ, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] McGill Univ, Ctr Genom & Policy, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
Direct-to-consumer; Genetic testing; Children; Ethics; Advertising; CHILDREN; ADOLESCENTS; RISKS;
D O I
10.1007/s10689-009-9253-9
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
More and more companies are advertising and selling genetic tests directly to consumers. Considering the ethical, legal, and psychological concerns surrounding genetic testing in minors, a study of companies' websites was performed in order to describe and analyze their policies with respect to this issue. Of the 29 companies analyzed, 13 did not provide any information about this matter, eight companies allowed genetic testing upon parental request, four companies stated that their website is not directed to children under 18 years, and four companies suggested that in order to be tested, applicants should have reached the age of legal majority. If private companies offer genetic tests which are also offered in a clinical setting, can they be expected to adhere to the existing clinical guidelines with regard to these tests? If so, a certain ambiguity exists. Many companies are emphasizing in their disclaimers that their services are not medical services and should not be used as a basis for making medical decisions. Nonetheless, it remains debatable whether genetic testing in minors would be appropriate in this context. In line with the Advisory Committee on Genetic Testing, the Human Genetics Commission addressed the problem of non-consensual testing and recommended not to supply genetic testing services directly to those under the age of 16 or to those not able to make a competent decision regarding testing.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 59
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Direct-to-consumer genetic testing for breast cancer risk
    Reed, E. Kate
    Edelman, Emily A.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSE PRACTITIONERS, 2018, 30 (10) : 548 - 550
  • [22] Are the kids really all right? Direct-to-consumer genetic testing in children: are company policies clashing with professional norms?
    Heidi Carmen Howard
    Denise Avard
    Pascal Borry
    European Journal of Human Genetics, 2011, 19 : 1122 - 1126
  • [23] The ethics and regulation of direct-to-consumer genetic testing
    Paula Boddington
    Genome Medicine, 1
  • [24] Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: Interdisciplinary Crossroads
    Stein, Richard A.
    JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH, 2012, 5 (01) : 35 - 67
  • [25] Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: Value and Risk
    Majumder, Mary A.
    Guerrini, Christi J.
    McGuire, Amy L.
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF MEDICINE, VOL 72, 2021, 2021, 72 : 151 - 166
  • [26] Direct-to-consumer DNA genetic testing and the GP
    Trent, Ronald
    AUSTRALIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2014, 43 (07) : 436 - 439
  • [27] Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: driving choice?
    Knoppers, Bartha Maria
    Avard, Denise
    Howard, Heidi Carmen
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2010, 10 (08) : 965 - 968
  • [28] The ethics and regulation of direct-to-consumer genetic testing
    Boddington, Paula
    GENOME MEDICINE, 2009, 1
  • [29] Media Coverage of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing
    Lynch, John
    Parrott, Ashley
    Hopkin, Robert J.
    Myers, Melanie
    JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 2011, 20 (05) : 486 - 494
  • [30] Current landscape of direct-to-consumer genetic testing and its role in ophthalmology: a review
    Sanfilippo, Paul G.
    Kearns, Lisa S.
    Wright, Philip
    Mackey, David A.
    Hewitt, Alex W.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2015, 43 (06) : 578 - 590