A study on extremely low-frequency electric and magnetic fields and cancer: Discussion of EMF safety limits

被引:7
|
作者
Nakagawa, M
机构
[1] Railway Technical Research Institute, Kokubunji, Tokyo 185
关键词
electric and magnetic fields; bioeffects; safety; extremely low-frequency; powerlines; cancer; melatonin;
D O I
10.1539/joh.39.18
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Since Wertheimer and Leeper reported in 1979 that the incidence of cancer in children living near distribution lines is twice or three times as high as normal, the association between leukemia or cancer and extremely-low-frequency (ELF) electric and magnetic fields (EMF, electromagnetic fields) has often been the subject of debate. Compared with the thermal effect of high frequency bands, the non-thermal effects of ELF-electromagnetic fields on animals are very weak and have been studied in the recent past. A positive correlation between low level ELF electromagnetic fields and some specific cancers was detected by epidemiological studies but not directly by laboratory experiments. Nevertheless it has been reported that very low-level (0.1 mu T order) ELF electromagnetic fields can induce cell proliferation and a high transcription rate in human lymphocytes and human carcinoma cell lines. However, more investigations are necessary to arrive at an appropriate conclusion as to whether a low level ELF electromagnetic field induces mutation or acts as a promotor of cancer. In the last two decades, equipment using high power EMF e.g. pulse magnetic fields have come into common use and the effects of eddy currents, which are induced by the time-varying magnetic fields, in humans and animals are clearly noticed. These effects are magnetophosphenes, spastic contraction of muscles and stimulation of nerves. In 1990, the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) published the threshold limit values (TLV) of ELF magnetic fields as a function of 60/f (frequency) mT while in 1993 the National Radiation Protection Board (NRPB of the UK) published 80/f mT safety guideline. These magnetic flux densities i.e. 1.2 mT at 50 Hz recommended by ACGIH or 1.6 mT at 50 Hz by NRPB were calculated so as to obtain a current density of 1-10 mAm(-2) i.e. the supposed minimum electric current to affect animals. While these recommended values are 100 to 1,000 times higher than the flux density levels in our living environment, the suggested value that epidemiologists think has deleterious effects on humans is 0.2 mu T. It is difficult to decide which is the right guideline to adopt: the one suggested by the results of epidemiological surveys indicating that very low-level EMF raises the incidence of leukemia and other cancer, or the one which was recommended as the minimum level of magnetic flux density inducing a current that would supposedly affect humans and animals. Therefore this disparity between the values arrived at by epidemiological surveys and that recommended by regulatory agencies has to be resolved.
引用
收藏
页码:18 / 28
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] LOW-FREQUENCY ELECTRIC AND MAGNETIC-FIELDS EVALUATION OF POWER-LINES
    JENKE, B
    CATANIA, PJ
    BROWN, D
    ENERGY SOURCES, 1995, 17 (04): : 421 - 427
  • [22] EXPOSURE TO EXTREMELY LOW-FREQUENCY MAGNETIC FIELDS IN LOW- AND MIDDLE-INCOME COUNTRIES: AN OVERVIEW
    Baaken, Dan
    Wollschlaeger, Daniel
    Samaras, Theodoros
    Schuez, Joachim
    Deltour, Isabelle
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2020, 191 (04) : 487 - 500
  • [23] Long-Term Monitoring of Extremely Low Frequency Magnetic Fields in Electric Vehicles
    Yang, Lei
    Lu, Meng
    Lin, Jun
    Li, Congsheng
    Zhang, Chen
    Lai, Zhijing
    Wu, Tongning
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 16 (19)
  • [24] Dosimetry Assessment for Human Exposure to Extremely Low Frequency Magnetic Fields in the Electric Vehicles
    Li, Congsheng
    Lin, Jun
    Lei, Jianmei
    Wu, Tongning
    Qi, Dianyuan
    Chen, Rui
    2018 12TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ANTENNAS, PROPAGATION AND ELECTROMAGNETIC THEORY (ISAPE), 2018,
  • [25] CHARACTERISTICS OF LOW-FREQUENCY ELECTRIC AND MAGNETIC-FIELDS IN THE VICINITY OF ELECTRIC-POWER LINES
    OLSEN, RG
    WONG, PS
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER DELIVERY, 1992, 7 (04) : 2046 - 2055
  • [26] Extremely low frequency-modulated static magnetic fields to treat cancer: A pilot study on patients with advanced neoplasm to assess safety and acute toxicity
    Ronchetto, F
    Barone, D
    Cintorino, M
    Berardelli, M
    Lissolo, S
    Orlassino, R
    Ossola, P
    Tofani, S
    BIOELECTROMAGNETICS, 2004, 25 (08) : 563 - 571
  • [27] Exposure Modelling of Extremely Low-Frequency Magnetic Fields from Overhead Power Lines and Its Validation by Measurements
    Burgi, Alfred
    Sagar, Sanjay
    Struchen, Benjamin
    Joss, Stefan
    Roosli, Martin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2017, 14 (09)
  • [28] Extremely low-frequency magnetic fields and risk of childhood leukemia: A risk assessment by the ARIMMORA consortium
    Schuez, Joachim
    Dasenbrock, Clemens
    Ravazzani, Paolo
    Roeoesli, Martin
    Schaer, Primo
    Bounds, Patricia L.
    Erdmann, Friederike
    Borkhardt, Arndt
    Cobaleda, Cesar
    Fedrowitz, Maren
    Hamnerius, Yngve
    Sanchez-Garcia, Isidro
    Seger, Rony
    Schmiegelow, Kjeld
    Ziegelberger, Gunde
    Capstick, Myles
    Manser, Melissa
    Mueller, Meike
    Schmid, Christoph D.
    Schuermann, David
    Struchen, Benjamin
    Kuster, Niels
    BIOELECTROMAGNETICS, 2016, 37 (03) : 183 - 189
  • [29] Associations of parental occupational exposure to extremely low-frequency magnetic fields with childhood leukemia risk
    Su, Liling
    Fei, Yue
    Wei, Xiaoxia
    Guo, Jing
    Jiang, Xiangen
    Lu, Liqin
    Chen, Guangdi
    LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA, 2016, 57 (12) : 2855 - 2862
  • [30] LEVELS OF EXTREMELY LOW-FREQUENCY ELECTRIC AND MAGNETIC FIELDS FROM OVERHEAD POWER LINES IN THE OUTDOOR ENVIRONMENT OF RAMALLAH CITY-PALESTINE
    Abuasbi, Falastine
    Lahham, Adnan
    Abdel-Raziq, Issam Rashid
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2018, 179 (03) : 229 - 232