共 50 条
Cost-effectiveness of Apixaban Versus Other Oral Anticoagulants for the Initial Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism and Prevention of Recurrence
被引:16
|作者:
Lanitis, Tereza
[1
]
Leipold, Robert
[2
]
Hamilton, Melissa
[3
]
Rublee, Dale
[4
]
Quon, Peter
[2
]
Browne, Chantelle
[1
]
Cohen, Alexander T.
[5
]
机构:
[1] Evidera, London, England
[2] Evidera, Bethesda, MD USA
[3] Bristol Myers Squibb Co, Princeton, NJ USA
[4] Pfizer, New York, NY USA
[5] Guys & St Thomas NHS Fdn Trust, London, England
关键词:
apixaban;
anticoagulants;
cost-effectiveness;
venous thromboembolism;
vitamin;
TERM-FOLLOW-UP;
RIVAROXABAN;
WARFARIN;
DABIGATRAN;
ENOXAPARIN;
STROKE;
PROPHYLAXIS;
DURATION;
THERAPY;
D O I:
10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.01.020
中图分类号:
R9 [药学];
学科分类号:
1007 ;
摘要:
Purpose: To assess the cost-effectiveness of apixaban versus rivaroxaban, low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH)/dabigatran, and LMWH/vitamin K antagonist (VKA) for the initial treatment and prevention of recurrent thromboembolic events in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE). Methods: A Markov model was developed to evaluate the pharmacoeconomic effect of 6 months of treatment with apixaban versus other anticoagulants over a lifetime horizon. Network meta-analyses were conducted using the results of the Apixaban after the Initial Management of Pulmonary Embolism and Deep Vein Thrombosis with First-Line Therapy (AMPLIFY), EINSTEIN-pooled, and RE-COVER I and II trials for the following end points: recurrent VTE, major bleeds, clinically relevant non-major bleeds, and treatment discontinuations. The analysis was conducted from the perspective of the United Kingdom National Health Service. The outcomes evaluated were the number of events avoided in a 1000-patient cohort, total costs, life years, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and cost per QALY gained over a patient's lifetime. Findings: Treatment for 6 months with apixaban was projected to result in fewer recurrent VTE and bleeding events in comparison to rivaroxaban, LMWH/dabigatran, and LMWH/VKA. Apixaban was cost-effective compared with LMWH/VKA at an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 2520 per QALY gained and was a dominant (ie, lower costs and higher QALYs) alternative to either rivaroxaban or LMWH/dabigatran. Sensitivity analysis indicated that results were robust over a wide range of inputs. Implications: The assessment of the effects and costs of apixaban in this study predicted that apixaban is a dominant alternative to rivaroxaban and LMWH/dabigatran and a cost-effective alternative to LMWH/VKA for 6 months of treatment of VTE and the prevention of recurrence. (C) 2016 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:478 / 493
页数:16
相关论文