Vaginal misoprostol compared with oral misoprostol in termination of second-trimester pregnancy

被引:170
作者
Ho, PC [1 ]
Ngai, SW [1 ]
Liu, KL [1 ]
Wong, GCY [1 ]
Lee, SWH [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV HONG KONG,DEPT OBSTET & GYNAECOL,HONG KONG,HONG KONG
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00419-5
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the efficacy of vaginal with oral misoprostol in termination of second-trimester pregnancy after pretreatment with mifepristone. Methods: Women requesting termination of trimester pregnancy were randomized into two Thirty-six to 48 hours after oral administration of 200 mg of mifepristone, women were given either oral or vaginal misoprostol 200 mu g every 3 hours for a maximum of five doses in the first 24 hours. Women receiving oral misoprostol also were given a vaginal placebo (vitamin B6), whereas those receiving vaginal misoprostol were given an oral placebo. If they failed to abort, a second course was given by the same route. Results: The median induction-abortion interval in the vaginal group (9 hours) was significantly shorter than that in the oral group (13 hours). The percentage of women aborting within 24 hours in the vaginal group (90%) was significantly higher than that in the oral group (69%). The median amount of misoprostol used in the vaginal group (600 mu g) also was significantly less than that in the oral group (1000 mu g). There was no significant difference in the incidence of side effects between the two groups except for fatigue and breast tenderness, which were more common in the oral group. Seventy-six percent of the women preferred the oral route, and 24.5% of the women preferred the vaginal route. Conclusion: Vaginal misoprostol is more effective than oral misoprostol in termination of second-trimester pregnancy after pretreatment with mifepristone, but more women preferred the oral route. (C) 1997 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
引用
收藏
页码:735 / 738
页数:4
相关论文
共 11 条