Participatory theme elicitation: open card sorting for user led qualitative data analysis

被引:8
作者
Best, Paul [1 ,2 ]
Badham, Jennifer [3 ]
McConnell, Tracey [4 ]
Hunter, Ruth F. [3 ]
机构
[1] Queens Univ, Sch Social Sci Educ & Social Work, 6 Coll Pk, Belfast BT7 1NN, Antrim, North Ireland
[2] Queens Univ, Immers Technol & Digital Mental Hlth Network, Belfast, Antrim, North Ireland
[3] Queens Univ, Ctr Publ Hlth, Belfast, Antrim, North Ireland
[4] Queens Univ, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Belfast, Antrim, North Ireland
关键词
Participatory data analysis; public-patient involvement; co-production; user involvement; participatory theme elicitation; card sorting;
D O I
10.1080/13645579.2021.1876616
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Participatory Theme Elicitation (PTE) is a new approach to increasing user-involvement in qualitative data analysis. In this five-step method, participants independently identify themes in the data using open card sorting, and are supported in their development of a set of themes that reflect all participant views. We describe and evaluate PTE with a case study, where nine lay researchers identified five core themes in qualitative data from an online intervention with depressed adults. Total participation time was approximately 6 hours. Evaluation data revealed high levels of satisfaction with the PTE process and the themes generated. The strong commitment to public engagement in social science research and limited guidance on methods for effective participatory analysis of qualitative data highlight the value and growing need for robust standardised approaches such as PTE.
引用
收藏
页码:213 / 231
页数:19
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Group based video-conferencing for adults with depression: Findings from a user-led qualitative data analysis using participatory theme elicitation [J].
Best P. ;
McConnell T. ;
Davidson G. ;
Badham J. ;
Neill R.D. .
Research Involvement and Engagement, 5 (1)
[2]   Network methods to support user involvement in qualitative data analyses: an introduction to Participatory Theme Elicitation [J].
Best, Paul ;
Badham, Jennifer ;
Corepal, Rekesh ;
O'Neill, Roisin F. ;
Tully, Mark A. ;
Kee, Frank ;
Hunter, Ruth F. .
TRIALS, 2017, 18
[3]   Fast unfolding of communities in large networks [J].
Blondel, Vincent D. ;
Guillaume, Jean-Loup ;
Lambiotte, Renaud ;
Lefebvre, Etienne .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL MECHANICS-THEORY AND EXPERIMENT, 2008,
[4]  
Boyle D., 2009, The Challenge of Co-production: How Equal Partnerships between Professionals and the Public are Crucial to Improving Public Services
[5]  
Braun V., 2006, QUALITATIVE RE SEARC, V3, DOI 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
[6]  
Bryman A., 2004, Social Research Methods
[7]   Thematic analysis of qualitative research data: Is it as easy as it sounds? [J].
Castleberry, Ashley ;
Nolen, Amanda .
CURRENTS IN PHARMACY TEACHING AND LEARNING, 2018, 10 (06) :807-815
[8]   A Systematic Review of Stakeholder Engagement in Comparative Effectiveness and Patient-Centered Outcomes Research [J].
Concannon, Thomas W. ;
Fuster, Melissa ;
Saunders, Tully ;
Patel, Kamal ;
Wong, John B. ;
Leslie, Laurel K. ;
Lau, Joseph .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2014, 29 (12) :1692-1701
[9]   What is participatory research? [J].
Cornwall, A ;
Jewkes, R .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1995, 41 (12) :1667-1676
[10]  
Csardi G., 2006, InterJournal Complex Syst., V1695, P1