Enhancing Engineering Project Management Through Process Alignment

被引:5
作者
Xue, Rui [1 ]
Baron, Claude [2 ]
Vingerhoeds, Rob [3 ]
Esteban, Philippe [4 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Univ Technol, Res Base Beijing Modern Mfg Dev, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Toulouse, INSA, LAAS, CNRS,ISAE,SUPAERO,QUARTZ Supmeca, Toulouse, France
[3] Univ Toulouse, ISAE, SUPAERO, LAAS,CNRS, Toulouse, France
[4] Univ Toulouse, UPS, LAAS, CNRS, Toulouse, France
关键词
Systems Engineering; Project Management; Standard Alignment; Process Integration; Program &
D O I
10.1080/10429247.2020.1865002
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In order to lead successful projects, coordinating the different business units of a company is compulsory. This paper proposes a framework to make companies' practices evolve toward a better alignment of the business units based on their processes, and illustrates it with project management and systems engineering processes. Indeed, all the different organization units intend to serve the common global objective to satisfy the customer needs, and need to closely collaborate during projects. However, work organization in companies often leads to barriers between these stakeholders, with the result of an incoherent decision-making that may compromise project execution. Therefore, the issue of processes alignment from different domains lies at the very heart of ongoing research topics and ranks first among economic and industrial concerns. This paper uses a qualitative approach to show how different business units' processes can be integrated and illustrate this framework by aligning the systems engineering and project management processes within a certain engineering project context. By using the proposed framework, different teams (or even different companies, in a context of distributed enterprise) can align their practices, while also making them evolve toward a better compliance with standards.
引用
收藏
页码:230 / 248
页数:19
相关论文
共 98 条
[31]  
Forsten-Astikainen R, 2017, J WORKPLACE LEARN, V29, P473, DOI 10.1108/JWL-04-2015-0028
[32]  
Goh S.C., 2002, J KNOWL MANAG, V6, DOI 10.1108/13673270210417664
[33]   Product development cycle time for business-to-business products [J].
Griffin, A .
INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 2002, 31 (04) :291-304
[34]   Systematic literature review of project failures: Current trends and scope for future research [J].
Gupta, Sandeep Kumar ;
Gunasekaran, Angappa ;
Antony, Jiju ;
Gupta, Shivam ;
Bag, Surajit ;
Roubaud, David .
COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 127 :274-285
[35]   A decision-making support system module for project manager selection according to past performance [J].
Hadad, Yossi ;
Keren, Baruch ;
Laslo, Zohar .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2013, 31 (04) :532-541
[36]   An empirical methodology for human integration in the SE technical processes [J].
Hardman, Nicholas ;
Colombi, John .
SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2012, 15 (02) :172-190
[37]  
HART SL, 1995, ACAD MANAGE REV, V20, P986
[38]   Openness and management systems integration: Pursuing innovation benefits [J].
Hernandez-Vivanco, Alfonso ;
Cruz-Cazares, Claudio ;
Bernardo, Merce .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2018, 49 :76-90
[39]   Standardisation framework to enable complex technological innovations: The case of photovoltaic technology [J].
Ho, Jae-Yun ;
O'Sullivan, Eoin .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2018, 50 :2-23
[40]  
Hoehne O., 2016, INCOSE INT S, V26, P1715, DOI [10.1002/j.2334-5837.2016.00256.x, DOI 10.1002/J.2334-5837.2016.00256.X]