The role of market power in driving innovation and productivity: a firm-level study of emerging ASEAN

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang, Jianhua [1 ]
Islam, Mohammad Shahidul [1 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Econ, Main Campus, Wuhan, Peoples R China
关键词
Research & development (R&D); Technological innovation; Institutional innovation; Productivity; Market power; ASEAN; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; IMPACT; PERFORMANCE; SPILLOVERS; GROWTH; MODEL; RISE;
D O I
10.1108/IJOEM-11-2019-0929
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose - The primary purpose of the study is to examine the role of market power in driving innovation and productivity of intangible intensive firms of eight emerging economies of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN-8). Design/methodology/approach - There is hardly any study on emerging economies that explored the causal chain of R&D-innovation-productivity, considering the role of market power in a structural model. Taking advantage of the availability of firm-level data and following the extended version of the Crepon, Duguet and Mairesse (CDM) model, we intend to fill the gap. The CDM model first explores the link between R&D and innovation, then the latter's impact on productivity. Besides, it captures sectoral heterogeneity and the differing roles of technological and institutional innovation on productivity. Findings - The manufacturing firms that held a higher markup had a more significant contribution to driving innovation than services one. While institutional innovation affected productivity positively, technological innovation had the opposite impact. Nevertheless, firms' higher degree of monopoly, in general, worsened productivity outcomes. The estimated results are robust to a range of alterations. Practical implications - The study offers implications for the competition policy of ASEAN. Originality/value - The sample of this study accounts for almost half of the world's best-performing emerging economies. Thus, the findings are likely to contribute to the thin literature on market power's role in driving innovation and productivity in the intangible economy of emerging markets.
引用
收藏
页码:1865 / 1888
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Exploring firm-level innovation and productivity in India
    Mishra, Aswini Kumar
    Sinha, Abhishek Kumar
    Khasnis, Abhijeet
    Vadlamani, Sai Thcja
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATION SCIENCE, 2021, 13 (05) : 583 - 609
  • [2] Innovation, exports, productivity and investment climate; a study based on Indian manufacturing firm-level data
    Veganzones-Varoudakis, M. -A.
    Plane, P.
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2019, 51 (41) : 4455 - 4476
  • [3] Innovation and Firm-Level Productivity: Evidence from Bangladesh
    Waheed, Abdul
    DEVELOPING ECONOMIES, 2017, 55 (04): : 290 - 314
  • [4] The Heterogeneous Impacts of R&D on Innovation in Services Sector: A Firm-Level Study of Developing ASEAN
    Zhang, Jianhua
    Islam, Mohammad Shahidul
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (04)
  • [5] The driving process of technological innovation in construction: a firm-level CDM analysis
    Gong, Zheng
    Wang, Nannan
    CONSTRUCTION INNOVATION-ENGLAND, 2022, 22 (02): : 222 - 241
  • [6] Land regulations, innovation and productivity: Firm-level evidence from China
    Song, Huasheng
    Zhang, Chao
    WORLD ECONOMY, 2024, 47 (04): : 1387 - 1426
  • [7] Innovation, firm productivity, and export survival: firm-level evidence from ASEAN developing countries
    Jitsutthiphakorn U.
    Journal of Economic Structures, 10 (1)
  • [8] The role of spatial agglomeration in a structural model of innovation, productivity and export: a firm-level analysis
    Antonietti, Roberto
    Cainelli, Giulio
    ANNALS OF REGIONAL SCIENCE, 2011, 46 (03): : 577 - 600
  • [9] Innovation strategies and productivity growth in developing countries: Firm-level evidence from Pakistani manufacturers
    Wadho, Waqar
    Chaudhry, Azam
    JOURNAL OF ASIAN ECONOMICS, 2022, 81
  • [10] Innovation and Perceived Corruption: A Firm-Level Analysis for India
    Dutta, Nabamita
    Kar, Saibal
    Beladi, Hamid
    BUSINESS AND POLITICS, 2022, 24 (02) : 151 - 170