Theorizing migration policy: Is there a third way?

被引：131
作者：
Boswell, Christina [1 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9YL, Midlothian, Scotland
来源：
INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION REVIEW | 2007年 / 41卷 / 01期
关键词：
D O I：
10.1111/j.1747-7379.2007.00057.x
中图分类号：
C921 [人口统计学];
学科分类号：
摘要：
This article critically reviews theories of migration policy according to two criteria: methodological rigor and explanatory plausibility. It finds that political economy accounts are theoretically robust, but at the price of oversimplification. Neo-institutional theories offer more sophisticated accounts, but fall short on a number of methodological and explanatory counts. As an alternative, this article suggests a theory focusing on the functional imperatives of the state in the area of migration, which shape its responses to societal interests and institutional structures.
引用
收藏
页码：75 / 100
页数：26
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1984, STATE CAPITALIST EUR
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1995, Notions of Nationalism
[3]  
Bartelson Jens, 2001, CRITIQUE STATE
[4]  
Baubock Rainer., 1994, TRANSNATIONAL CITIZE
[5]  
Bellamy R., 2004, NATL DEMOCRACY RIGHT, P9
[6]  
Bigo Didier., 2002, Alternatives, V27, P63, DOI [10.1177/03043754020270S105, DOI 10.1177/03043754020270S105]
[7]  
Bommes Michael, 2000, Immigration and Welfare. Challenging the Borders of the Welfare State, P1
[8]   European values and the asylum crisis [J].
Boswell, C .
INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS, 2000, 76 (03) :537-+
[9]  
Brochmann G., 1999, MECH IMMIGRATION CON, P297
[10]  
BRUBAKER R, 2004, INT MIGR REV, V29, P903
123456