A calculator for mortality following emergency general surgery based on the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database

被引:24
|
作者
Haskins, Ivy N. [1 ]
Maluso, Patrick J. [1 ]
Schroeder, Mary E. [1 ]
Amdur, Richard L. [1 ]
Vaziri, Khashayar [1 ]
Agarwal, Samir [2 ]
Sarani, Babak [1 ]
机构
[1] George Washington Univ, Dept Surg, Ctr Trauma & Crit Care, Washington, DC USA
[2] George Washington Univ, Dept Surg, Div Colon & Rectal Surg, Washington, DC USA
关键词
Emergency; mortality; risk; surgery; PREDICTION RULES; CARDIAC RISK; VALIDATION; MODELS; IMPACT; CLASSIFICATION; DERIVATION; MORBIDITY; TOOLS; INDEX;
D O I
10.1097/TA.0000000000001451
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: The complex nature of current morbidity and mortality predictor models do not lend themselves to clinical application at the bedside of patients undergoing emergency general surgery (EGS). Our aim was to develop a simplified risk calculator for prediction of early postoperative mortality after EGS. METHODS: EGS cases other than appendectomy and cholecystectomy were identified within the American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program database from 2005 to 2014. Seventy-five percent of the cases were selected at random for model development, whereas 25% of the cases were used for model testing. Stepwise logistic regression was performed for creation of a 30-day mortality risk calculator. Model accuracy and reproducibility was investigated using the concordance index (c statistic) and Pearson correlations. RESULTS: A total of 79,835 patients met inclusion criteria. Overall, 30-day mortality was 12.6%. A simplified risk model formula was derived from five readily available preoperative variables as follows: 0.034*age + 0.8*nonindependent status + 0.88*sepsis + 1.1 (if bun >= 29) or 0.57 (if bun >= 18 and < 29) + 1.16 (if albumin < 2.7), or 0.61 (if albumin >= 2.7 and < 3.4). The risk of 30-day mortality was stratified into deciles. The risk of 30-day mortality ranged from 2% for patients in the lowest risk level to 31% for patients in the highest risk level. The c statistic was 0.83 in both the derivation and testing samples. CONCLUSION: Five readily available preoperative variables can be used to predict the 30-day mortality risk for patients undergoing EGS. Further studies are needed to validate this risk calculator and to determine its bedside applicability. Copyright (C) 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1094 / 1099
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Morbidity and Mortality Risk Assessment in Gynecologic Oncology Surgery Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database
    Kohut, Adrian
    Orfanelli, Theofano
    Poggio, Juan Lucas
    Gibbon, Darlene
    De Meritens, Alexandre Buckley
    Richard, Scott
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2018, 28 (04) : 840 - 847
  • [2] Development of an American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program: Morbidity and Mortality Risk Calculator for Colorectal Surgery
    Cohen, Mark E.
    Bilimoria, Karl Y.
    Ko, Clifford Y.
    Hall, Bruce Lee
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2009, 208 (06) : 1009 - 1016
  • [3] Utility of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program surgical risk calculator in predicting mortality in an Australian acute surgical unit
    Parkin, Cameron J.
    Moritz, Peter
    Kirkland, Olivia
    Doane, Matthew
    Glover, Anthony
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 90 (05) : 746 - 751
  • [4] "July Effect" in Elective Spine Surgery Analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database
    Bohl, Daniel D.
    Fu, Michael C.
    Gruskay, Jordan A.
    Basques, Bryce A.
    Golinvaux, Nicholas S.
    Grauer, Jonathan N.
    SPINE, 2014, 39 (07) : 603 - 611
  • [5] Quality improvement in gastrointestinal surgical oncology with American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program
    Lucas, Donald J.
    Pawlik, Timothy M.
    SURGERY, 2014, 155 (04) : 593 - 601
  • [6] Complications of Capsulectomies: An Analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database
    Abi-Rafeh, Jad
    Safran, Tyler
    Winocour, Sebastian
    Dionisopoulos, Tassos
    Davison, Peter
    Epi, S. M.
    Vorstenbosch, Joshua
    AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL OPEN FORUM, 2022, 4
  • [7] When Is Death Inevitable after Emergency Laparotomy? Analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database
    Al-Temimi, Mohammed H.
    Griffee, Matthew
    Enniss, Toby M.
    Preston, Robert
    Vargo, Daniel
    Overton, Sean
    Kimball, Edward
    Barton, Richard
    Nirula, Raminder
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2012, 215 (04) : 503 - 511
  • [8] Quality improvement in surgery: introduction of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program into New South Wales
    Richardson, Arthur J.
    Cox, Michael R.
    Shakeshaft, Anthony J.
    Hodge, Bruce
    Morgan, Gary
    Pang, Tony
    Zeng, Mingjuan
    Scanlon, Kate
    Austin, Robyn
    Dawadi, Ashma
    Burgess, Crystal
    Rawstron, Ellen
    Dalton, Sarah
    Leveque, Jean-Frederic
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 89 (05) : 471 - 475
  • [9] Validity of the American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program risk calculator in South Australian glossectomy patients
    Kao, S. S.
    Frauenfelder, C.
    Wong, D.
    Edwards, S.
    Krishnan, S.
    Ooi, E. H.
    JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 2018, 132 (02) : 173 - 179
  • [10] Evaluation of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Risk Calculator to predict outcomes after hysterectomies
    Hamade, Sara
    Alshiek, Jonia
    Javadian, Pouya
    Ahmed, Sushma
    McLeod, Francine N.
    Shobeiri, S. Abbas
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2022, 158 (03) : 714 - 721