Secondary malignancies after rectal cancer resection with and without radiation therapy: A propensity-adjusted, population-based SEER analysis

被引:40
|
作者
Warschkow, Rene [1 ,2 ]
Guller, Ulrich [3 ,4 ]
Cerny, Thomas [4 ]
Schmied, Bruno Martin [1 ]
Plasswilm, Ludwig [5 ]
Putora, Paul Martin [5 ]
机构
[1] Cantonal Hosp, Dept Surg, St Gallen, Switzerland
[2] Heidelberg Univ, Inst Med Biometry & Informat, Heidelberg, Germany
[3] Cantonal Hosp, Dept Med Oncol & Hematol, St Gallen, Switzerland
[4] Univ Bern, Dept Visceral Surg & Med, Bern, Switzerland
[5] Cantonal Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, St Gallen, Switzerland
关键词
Rectal cancer; Radiation; Surveillance; Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database; Propensity score; ACUTE ORGAN TOXICITY; 2ND CANCERS; ENDOMETRIAL CANCER; RADIOTHERAPY; IRRADIATION; CARCINOMA; RISK; RADIOCHEMOTHERAPY; NEOPLASMS; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2017.02.007
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The relationship between radiation therapy for rectal cancer and secondary malignancies is debated. The present study is the first population-based analysis using conventional multivariable analyses as well as propensity score matching to assess this relationship. Methods: Overall, 77,484 patients after resection of localized or locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma diagnosed between 1973 and 2012 were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry. The occurrence of secondary malignancies diagnosed at least 1 (median follow up 5.8 years [1-39.9 years]) year after rectal cancer diagnosis was compared in patients who did and did not undergo radiation using stratified and propensity score matched Cox regression analysis. Results: Of 77,484 patients, 34,114 underwent radiation and 43,370 did not. Ignoring gender and entity, radiation therapy was not associated with secondary malignancies (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.97 (95%CI: 0.92-1.02, P = 0.269). The risk for prostate cancer was decreased and (HR = 0.42, 95%CI: 0.36-0.48, P < 0.001) and increased risk for endometrial cancer (HR = 1.95, 95%CI: 1.49-2.56, P < 0.001). Overall, patients undergoing radiation had higher risks for lung cancer (HR =1.18, 95%Cl: 1.06-1.30, P < 0.001), bladder cancer (HR = 1.54, 95%CI: 1.31-1.80, P < 0.001) and lymphomas (HR = 1.27, 95%Cl: 1.03-1.58, P = 0.026). Conclusions: The present analysis describes the occurence of secondary malignancies after pelvic radiation in patients undergoing rectal cancer surgery. Indeed, radiation for rectal cancer is associated with a significantly decreased risk of prostate cancer, however, an increased risk of endometrial, lung, and bladder cancer as well as lymphomas was observed. Overall, the risk of secondary malignancies was slightly decreased with radiation in patients undergoing rectal cancer resection, this was attributable to lower rates in prostate cancer. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:139 / 146
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Improved Survival After Primary Tumor Surgery in Metastatic Breast Cancer A Propensity-adjusted, Population-based SEER Trend Analysis
    Warschkow, Rene
    Guller, Ulrich
    Tarantino, Ignazio
    Cerny, Thomas
    Schmied, Bruno M.
    Thuerlimann, Beat
    Joerger, Markus
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2016, 263 (06) : 1188 - 1198
  • [2] Risk of Secondary Malignancies After Pelvic Radiation: A Population-based Analysis
    McPartland, Connor
    Salib, Andrew
    Banks, Joshua
    Mark, James R.
    Lallas, Costas D.
    Trabulsi, Edouard J.
    Gomella, Leonard G.
    Goldberg, Hanan
    Leiby, Benjamin
    Den, Robert
    Chandrasekar, Thenappan
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2024, 63 : 52 - 61
  • [3] A population-based analysis of second primary cancers after irradiation for rectal cancer
    Kendal, Wayne S.
    Nicholas, Garth
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2007, 30 (04): : 333 - 339
  • [4] Risk prediction of second primary malignancies after gynecological malignant neoplasms resection with and without radiation therapy: a population-based surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) analysis
    Wang, Jing
    Zhang, Chan
    Xiang, Yaoxian
    Han, Baojuan
    Cheng, Yurong
    Tong, Yingying
    Yan, Dong
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 149 (14) : 12703 - 12711
  • [5] Predictors for regional lymph node metastasis in T1 rectal cancer: a population-based SEER analysis
    Brunner, Walter
    Widmann, Bernhard
    Marti, Lukas
    Tarantino, Ignazio
    Schmied, Bruno M.
    Warschkow, Rene
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2016, 30 (10): : 4405 - 4415
  • [6] Risk and prognosis of second corpus uteri cancer after radiation therapy for pelvic cancer: A population-based analysis
    Yu, Guanhua
    Wei, Ran
    Li, Shuofeng
    Wang, Yongjiao
    Liu, Hengchang
    Chen, Tianli
    Guan, Xu
    Wang, Xishan
    Jiang, Zheng
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [7] Long-term outcome of chronic hepatitis C in a population-based cohort and impact of antiviral therapy: a propensity-adjusted analysis
    Di Martino, V.
    Crouzet, J.
    Hillon, P.
    Thevenot, T.
    Minello, A.
    Monnet, E.
    JOURNAL OF VIRAL HEPATITIS, 2011, 18 (07) : 493 - 505
  • [8] Risk and Prognosis of Secondary Bladder Cancer After Radiation Therapy for Rectal Cancer: A Large Population-Based Cohort Study
    Guan, Xu
    Wei, Ran
    Yang, Runkun
    Lu, Zhao
    Liu, Enrui
    Zhao, Zhixun
    Chen, Haipeng
    Yang, Ming
    Liu, Zheng
    Jiang, Zheng
    Wang, Xishan
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 10
  • [9] The efficacy of radiation therapy in adrenocortical carcinoma A propensity score analysis of a population-based study
    Luo, You
    Chen, San-San
    Zheng, Xiang-Guang
    Luo, Li
    Wang, Sen
    MEDICINE, 2017, 96 (17)
  • [10] Treatment outcomes of patients with involved resection margin after rectal cancer surgery: A nationwide population-based cohort study in South Korea
    Bong, Jun Woo
    Lee, Jung Ae
    Ju, Yeonuk
    Seo, Jihyun
    Kang, Sang Hee
    Lee, Sun Il
    Min, Byung Wook
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 18 (04) : 378 - 387