The Effects of Amplification on Listening Self-Efficacy in Adults With Sensorineural Hearing Loss

被引:5
作者
Kawaguchi, Lauren [1 ]
Wu, Yu-Hsiang [2 ]
Miller, Christi [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Speech & Hearing Sci, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Iowa, Dept Commun Sci & Disorders, Iowa City, IA USA
关键词
MONTREAL COGNITIVE ASSESSMENT; OLDER-ADULTS; HELP-SEEKING; AID USE; PERSONALITY; IMPAIRMENT; SATISFACTION; BEHAVIORS; INVENTORY; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1044/2019_AJA-18-0120
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate listening self-efficacy ratings between aided and unaided conditions in different communication environments and to determine what patient- and device-centered variables were associated with individual differences. Method: An observational, cross-sectional study design was used to evaluate 165 older adults with mild to moderately severe sensorineural hearing loss who wore hearing aids at least 8 hr per week. Listening self-efficacy for both unaided and aided listening was measured using the Listening Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (LSEQ; Smith, Pichora-Fuller, Watts, & La More, 2011), consisting of a global score and subscales of Dialogue in Quiet, Directed Listening, and Complex Listening. Metrics to explain variability in the degree of improvement in LSEQ ratings with aided listening included patient-centered variables of age, pure-tone average, and personality and device-centered variables of hearing aid use, speech intelligibility index, directionality, and noise reduction. The NEO Five-Inventory (Costa & McCrae, 1985) was used to measure 5 personality traits (neuroticism, extraversion, openness, agreeableness, and conscientiousness). Associations were evaluated between LSEQ ratings and patient- and device-centered variables using a linear mixed-model analysis. Results: Statistically significant improvements in LSEQ ratings were found for aided conditions (relative to unaided conditions), easier listening environments, lower pure-tone averages, and lower levels of neuroticism. Furthermore, the improvement in listening self-efficacy with hearing aids did not depend on the listening environment but did alter with severity of hearing loss, length of hearing aid use, and levels of conscientiousness. Conclusions: Results of this study suggest that wearing hearing aids is associated with improved listening self-efficacy in a variety of communication environments. Aural rehabilitation and counseling may focus on improving listening self-efficacy to address the challenges of consistent hearing aid use and reduced quality of life related to hearing loss.
引用
收藏
页码:572 / 582
页数:11
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [1] Continuous glucose monitoring counseling improves physical activity behaviors of individuals with type 2 diabetes: A randomized clinical trial
    Allen, Nancy A.
    Fain, James A.
    Braun, Barry
    Chipkin, Stuart R.
    [J]. DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2008, 80 (03) : 371 - 379
  • [2] American National Standards Institute, 2003, ANSI S3.22-2003
  • [3] American National Standards Institute, 2009, S3212004 ANSI
  • [4] Healthcare outcomes assessed with observational study designs compared with those assessed in randomized trials
    Anglemyer, Andrew
    Horvath, Hacsi T.
    Bero, Lisa
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2014, (04):
  • [5] SELF-EFFICACY - TOWARD A UNIFYING THEORY OF BEHAVIORAL CHANGE
    BANDURA, A
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1977, 84 (02) : 191 - 215
  • [6] Bandura A., 1992, SELF EFFICACY THOUGH, P355
  • [7] Barry E.K., 2002, HEARING J, V55, P44
  • [8] Digital noise reduction: Outcomes from laboratory and field studies
    Bentler, Ruth
    Wu, Yu-Hsiang
    Kettel, Jerrica
    Hurtig, Richard
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2008, 47 (08) : 447 - 460
  • [9] PREFERRED METHOD FOR CLINICAL DETERMINATION OF PURE-TONE THRESHOLDS
    CARHART, R
    JERGER, JF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING DISORDERS, 1959, 24 (04): : 330 - 345
  • [10] A re-examination of Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) cutoff scores
    Carson, Nicole
    Leach, Larry
    Murphy, Kelly J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 2018, 33 (02) : 379 - 388