Benchmark structural control problem for a seismically excited highway bridge-Part II: Phase I Sample control designs

被引:47
作者
Tan, Ping [2 ]
Agrawal, Anil K. [1 ]
机构
[1] CUNY City Coll, Dept Civil Engn, New York, NY 10031 USA
[2] Guangzhou Univ, Earthquake Engn Res & Test Ctr, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
structural response control; seismically excited highway bridge; active response control; semi-active response control; passive response control; CONTROL STRATEGIES; RESPONSE CONTROL; MR DAMPERS;
D O I
10.1002/stc.300
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This paper presents sample control system designs for the three-dimensional benchmark structural control problem for seismically excited highway bridge. Three types of sample control systems, namely nonlinear viscous dampers, ideal hydraulic actuators and magnetorheological fluid dampers, are designed and presented for comparison by participants in the study. For each of the three-sample control systems, a total of 16 control devices are proposed to be placed orthogonally between the deck-ends and abutments for the reduction of earthquake-induced vibrations of the highway bridge. An H-2/LQG control algorithm is selected for the active case and a clipped optimal control algorithm is chosen for the semi-active case. To facilitate the controller design, an eigenmode reduction method is used to reduce the number of degrees of freedom of the initially elastic model to obtain a reduced-order model. However, the evaluation model to simulate the performance of control strategies is the full-order nonlinear finite element model. A Kalman filter is used to estimate states of the reduced-order model required for the applications of controllers for both active and semi-active cases using selected acceleration and displacement measurements. The modeling and sample control system designs presented in this paper are for illustration purposes only, and are not intended to be competitive. Participants of this benchmark study are expected to employ more competitive control designs for their own control strategies. These control strategies may be passive, active, semi-active or a combination thereof. Copyright (C) 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:530 / 548
页数:19
相关论文
共 41 条
[11]  
Feng M Q., 2000, Journal of Bridge Engineering, V5, P67, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2000)5:1(67)
[12]  
Fujino Y., 1996, P ASCE STRUCT C CHI, P361
[13]   Structural control: Past, present, and future [J].
Housner, GW ;
Bergman, LA ;
Caughey, TK ;
Chassiakos, AG ;
Claus, RO ;
Masri, SF ;
Skelton, RE ;
Soong, TT ;
Spencer, BF ;
Yao, JTP .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS, 1997, 123 (09) :897-971
[14]  
Kartoum A., 1992, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V8, P345
[15]   SEISMIC RESPONSE CONTROL OF BRIDGES BY VARIABLE DAMPERS [J].
KAWASHIMA, K ;
UNJOH, S .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1994, 120 (09) :2583-2601
[16]  
KIM SB, 2004, US KOR WORKSH SMART, P2
[17]  
Kim SB, 2004, 17 ASCE ENG MECH C E
[18]   CONTROL OF SLIDING-ISOLATED BRIDGE WITH ABSOLUTE ACCELERATION FEEDBACK [J].
NAGARAJAIAH, S ;
RILEY, MA ;
REINHORN, A .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS-ASCE, 1993, 119 (11) :2317-2332
[19]   Smart base-isolated benchmark building. Part II: phase I sample controllers for linear isolation systems [J].
Nagarajaiah, S. ;
Narasimhan, S. .
STRUCTURAL CONTROL & HEALTH MONITORING, 2006, 13 (2-3) :589-604
[20]   Smart base-isolated benchmark building part IV: Phase II sample controllers for nonlinear isolation systems [J].
Narasimhan, S. ;
Nagarajaiah, S. ;
Johnson, E. A. .
STRUCTURAL CONTROL & HEALTH MONITORING, 2008, 15 (05) :657-672