Bilateral S3 nerve stimulation, a minimally invasive alternative treatment for postoperative stress incontinence after implantation of an anterior root stimulator with posterior rhizotomy: a preliminary observation

被引:3
作者
Everaert, K
Derie, A
Van Laere, M
Vandekerckhove, T
机构
[1] State Univ Ghent Hosp, Dept Urol, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[2] State Univ Ghent Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[3] State Univ Ghent Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
关键词
incontinence; neurogenic bladder; neurostimulation; rhizotomy;
D O I
10.1038/sj.sc.3100984
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study design: A preliminary report. Objectives: Urinary stress incontinence following implantation of an anterior root stimulator and a posterior rhizotomy is a rare complication which is difficult to treat, It is seen in patients with an open bladder neck (T9-L2 lesion). An artificial urinary sphincter is a possible treatment for this condition but has a higher failure rate in patients with neurogenic bladder disease and could complicate micturition. Setting: Ghent, Belgium. Methods: A male paraplegic patient (T9, complete lesion) aged 36 was suffering from severe urinary incontinence due to detrusor hyperreflexia. Preoperatively the bladder neck was closed on cystography. Following implantation (6/95) of an intradural anterior root stimulator with posterior rhizotomy, severe urinary stress incontinence presented. Bilateral S3 foramen leads were implanted and connected to a pulse generator. Results: The patient has been continent with continuous stimulation of both S3 roots for 4 years, and no fatigue of the levator muscles has been seen. Preoperative urodynamics are compared to results 3 years postoperatively. Conclusion: Bilateral S3 stimulation is a feasible and minimally invasive treatment of urinary stress incontinence following implantation of an anterior root stimulator.
引用
收藏
页码:262 / 264
页数:3
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]  
BRINDLEY G S, 1974, Journal of Physiology (Cambridge), V237, P55
[2]  
CRAGGS MD, 1998, NEURUROL URODYN, V17, P411
[3]   Mayo Clinic long-term analysis of the functional durability of the AMS 800 artificial urinary sphincter: A review of 323 cases [J].
Elliott, DS ;
Barrett, DM .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 159 (04) :1206-1208
[4]   LONG-TERM RESULTS OF THE ARTIFICIAL URINARY SPHINCTER IN MALE-PATIENTS WITH NEUROGENIC BLADDER [J].
GONZALEZ, R ;
MERINO, FG ;
VAUGHN, M .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1995, 154 (02) :769-770
[5]  
Heesakkers J, 1997, NEUROUROL URODYNAM, V16, P117, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6777(1997)16:2<117::AID-NAU5>3.3.CO
[6]  
2-C
[7]   SACRAL ANTERIOR ROOT STIMULATION - PREREQUISITES AND INDICATIONS [J].
MADERSBACHER, H ;
FISCHER, J .
NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 1993, 12 (05) :489-494
[8]  
VanKerrebroeck PEV, 1997, EUR UROL, V31, P263