Qualitative process evaluation of the Perioperative Quality Improvement Programme (PQIP): study protocol

被引:9
|
作者
Wagstaff, Duncan [1 ,2 ]
Moonesinghe, S. Ramani [1 ,2 ]
Fulop, Naomi J. [3 ]
Vindrola-Padros, Cecilia [3 ]
机构
[1] Royal Coll Anaesthetists, Hlth Serv Res Ctr, London, England
[2] UCL, Res Dept Targeted Intervent, Ctr Perioperat Med, London, England
[3] UCL, Dept Appl Hlth Res, London, England
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2019年 / 9卷 / 07期
关键词
SURGICAL OUTCOMES; FEEDBACK; AUDIT; CARE; INTERVENTIONS; POLICY;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030214
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction The Perioperative Quality Improvement Programme (PQIP) is designed to measure complications after major elective surgery and improve these through feedback of data to clinicians. Previous research suggests that despite the significant resources which go into collecting data for national clinical audits, the information they contain is not always used effectively to improve local services. Methods and analysis We will conduct a formative process evaluation of PQIP comprising a multisited qualitative study to analyse PQIPs programme theory, barriers, facilitators and wider contextual factors that influence implementation. The research will be carried out with the PQIP project team and six National Health Service (NHS) Trusts in England, selected according to geographical location, type of hospital, size and level of engagement with PQIP. We will include one Trust which has not expressed interest in the PQIP for comparison and to explore the role of secular trend in any changes in practice. We will use semi-structured interviews (up to 144 in Trusts and 12 with the project team), non-participant observations (up to 150 hours) and documentary analysis. We will track the lifecycle of perioperative data, exploring the transformations it undergoes from creation to use. We will use framework analysis with categories both from our research questions and from themes emerging from the data. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval has been granted from the University College London Research Ethics Committee (ref 10375/001). Permissions to conduct research at NHS Trusts have been granted by local Research and Development offices in coordination with the Health Research Authority. We will follow guidelines for data security, confidentiality and information governance. Findings will be shared at regular time points with the PQIP project team to inform the implementation of the programme, and with participating NHS Trusts to help them reflect on how they currently use data for improvement of perioperative services.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Realist evaluation of a complex integrated care programme: protocol for a mixed methods study
    Nurjono, Milawaty
    Shrestha, Pami
    Lee, Alice
    Lim, Xin Ya
    Shiraz, Farah
    Tan, Shermin
    Wong, Shing Hei
    Foo, Kah Mun
    Wee, Thomas
    Toh, Sue-Anne
    Yoong, Joanne
    Vrijhoef, Hubertus Johannes Maria
    BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (03):
  • [22] Contextual factors influencing a systemic quality improvement strategy: A qualitative study
    Dare, Labante Outcha
    Champagne, Francois
    Denis, Jean-Louis
    SANTE PUBLIQUE, 2024, 36 (05): : 61 - 72
  • [23] Implementation of a crisis resolution team service improvement programme: a qualitative study of the critical ingredients for success
    Lamb, Danielle
    Milton, Alyssa
    Forsyth, Rebecca
    Lloyd-Evans, Brynmor
    Akther, Syeda
    Fullarton, Kate
    O'Hanlon, Puffin
    Johnson, Sonia
    Morant, Nicola
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH SYSTEMS, 2024, 18 (01):
  • [24] Community-based rehabilitation programme for adolescents with mental health conditions in Israel: a qualitative study protocol
    Tuaf, Hila
    Orkibi, Hod
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (12):
  • [25] Music-based environmental therapy and training programme: a qualitative evaluation study, Norway
    Batt-Rawden, Kari Bjerke
    Vegard Berg, Geir
    Andersson, Anders-Petter
    HEALTH PROMOTION INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 38 (04)
  • [26] Protocol for process evaluation of integration of mental health into primary healthcare in two states in Nigeria: the mhSUN programme
    Eaton, Julian
    Akande, Yusuf
    Onukogu, Uchechi
    Nwefoh, Emeka
    Sheikh, Taiwo Lateef
    Ekpe, Ekpe Essien
    Gureje, Oye
    BJPSYCH OPEN, 2021, 7 (02):
  • [27] Optimization of a Quality Improvement Tool for Cancer Diagnosis in Primary Care: Qualitative Study
    Chima, Sophie
    Martinez-Gutierrez, Javiera
    Hunter, Barbara
    Manski-Nankervis, Jo-Anne
    Emery, Jon
    JMIR FORMATIVE RESEARCH, 2022, 6 (08)
  • [28] Study protocol: realist evaluation of effectiveness and sustainability of a community health workers programme in improving maternal and child health in Nigeria
    Mirzoev, Tolib
    Etiaba, Enyi
    Ebenso, Bassey
    Uzochukwu, Benjamin
    Manzano, Ana
    Onwujekwe, Obinna
    Huss, Reinhard
    Ezumah, Nkoli
    Hicks, Joseph P.
    Newell, James
    Ensor, Timothy
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2016, 11
  • [29] Disseminating quality improvement: study protocol for a large cluster-randomized trial
    Quanbeck, Andrew R.
    Gustafson, David H.
    Ford, James H., II
    Pulvermacher, Alice
    French, Michael T.
    McConnell, K. John
    McCarty, Dennis
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2011, 6
  • [30] The evaluation of a healthcare passport to improve quality of care and communication for people living with dementia (EQuIP): a protocol paper for a qualitative, longitudinal study
    Leavey, Gerard
    Abbott, Aine
    Watson, Max
    Todd, Stephen
    Coates, Vivien
    McIlfactrick, Sonja
    McCormack, Brendan
    Waterhouse-Bradley, Bethany
    Curran, Emma
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2016, 16